Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocation
Rohan Ghuge, Sahil Singla, Yifan Wang
Abstract
Online Resource Allocation problem is a central problem in many areas of Computer Science, Operations Research, and Economics. In this problem, we sequentially receive n stochastic requests for m kinds of shared resources, where each request can be satisfied in multiple ways, consuming different amounts of resources and generating different values. The goal is to achieve a (1−є)-approximation to the hindsight optimum, where є>0 is a small constant, assuming each resource has a large budget (at least Ω((1/є))). In this paper, we investigate the learnability and robustness of online resource allocation. Our primary contribution is a novel Exponential Pricing algorithm with the following properties: Firstly, it requires only a single sample from each of the n request distributions to achieve a (1−є)-approximation for online resource allocation with large budgets. Such an algorithm was previously unknown, even with access to polynomially many samples, as prior work either assumed full distributional knowledge or was limited to i.i.d. or random-order arrivals. Secondly, it is robust to corruptions in the outliers model and the value augmentation model . Specifically, it maintains its (1 − є)-approximation guarantee under both these robustness models, resolving the open question posed by Argue, Gupta, Molinaro, and Singla (SODA 2022). Lastly, it operates as a simple item-pricing algorithm that ensures incentive compatibility. The intuition behind our Exponential Pricing algorithm is that the price of a resource should adjust exponentially as it is overused or underused. It differs from conventional approaches that use an online learning algorithm for item pricing. This departure guarantees that the algorithm will never run out of any resource, but loses the usual no-regret properties of online learning algorithms, necessitating a new analytical approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3eb56dfe-d6d5-446e-b636-3a4271b75c80Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Improved Truthful Mechanisms for Subadditive Combinatorial Auctions: Breaking the Logarithmic BarrierSepehr Assadi, Thomas Kesselheim, Sahil SinglaSODA 2021 · 22 citations
- An O(log log m) Prophet Inequality for Subadditive Combinatorial AuctionsPaul Dütting, Thomas Kesselheim, Brendan LucierFOCS 2020 · 22 citations
- A Constant Factor Prophet Inequality for Online Combinatorial AuctionsJosé Correa, Andrés CristiSTOC 2023 · 18 citations
- Learning from a Sample in Online AlgorithmsC. J. Argue, Alan M. Frieze, Anupam Gupta, Christopher SeilerNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2022 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Time Fairness in Online Knapsack ProblemsAdam Lechowicz, Rik Sengupta, Bo Sun, Shahin Kamali et al.ICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- No-Regret Learning Under Adversarial Resource Constraints: A Spending Plan Is All You Need!Francesco Emanuele Stradi, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola Gatti et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair DivisionDavin Choo, Winston Fu, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Tze-Yang Poon et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation ProblemsSantiago R. Balseiro, Haihao Lu, Vahab S. MirrokniICML 2020 · 102 citations
- Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and BeyondSantiago R. Balseiro, Haihao Lu, Vahab S. MirrokniICML 2021 · 67 citations
