Smooth, Integrated Proofs of Cryptographic Constant Time for Nondeterministic Programs and Compilers
Owen Conoly, Andres Erbsen, Adam Chlipala
Abstract
Formal verification of software and compilers has been used to rule out large classes of security-critical issues, but risk of unintentional information leakage has received much less consideration. It is a key requirement for formal specifications to leave some details of a system’s behavior unspecified so that future implementation changes can be accommodated, and yet it is nonetheless expected that these choices would not be made based on confidential information the system handles. This paper formalizes that notion using omnisemantics and plain single-copy assertions, giving for the first time a specification of what it means for a nondeterministic program to be constant-time or more generally to avoid leaking (a part of) its inputs. We use this theory to prove data-leak-free execution of core cryptographic routines compiled from Bedrock2 C to RISC-V machine code, showing that the smooth specification and proof experience omnisemantics provides for nondeterminism extends to constant-time properties in the same setting. We also study variants of the key program-compiler contract, highlighting pitfalls of tempting simplifications and subtle consequences of how inputs to nondeterministic choices are constrained. Our results are backed by modular program-logic and compiler-correctness theorems, and they integrate into a neat end-to-end theorem in the Coq proof assistant.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3e5e63b2-bd2d-42bd-aa12-74b690032b55Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- HACL*: A Verified Modern Cryptographic LibraryJean Karim Zinzindohoué, Karthikeyan Bhargavan, Jonathan Protzenko, Benjamin BeurdoucheCCS 2017 · 258 citations
- Jasmin: High-Assurance and High-Speed CryptographyJosé Bacelar Almeida, Manuel Barbosa, Gilles Barthe, Arthur Blot et al.CCS 2017 · 157 citations
- Simple High-Level Code for Cryptographic Arithmetic - With Proofs, Without CompromisesAndres Erbsen, Jade Philipoom, Jason Gross, Robert Sloan et al.S&P 2019 · 147 citations
- Interaction trees: representing recursive and impure programs in CoqLi-yao Xia, Yannick Zakowski, Paul He, Chung-Kil Hur et al.POPL 2020 · 133 citations
Related papers
- Structured Leakage and Applications to Cryptographic Constant-Time and CostGilles Barthe, Benjamin Grégoire, Vincent Laporte, Swarn PriyaCCS 2021 · 2 citations
- ProSpeCT: Provably Secure Speculation for the Constant-Time PolicyLesly-Ann Daniel, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Sébastien Bardin et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Formal verification of a constant-time preserving C compilerGilles Barthe, Sandrine Blazy, Benjamin Grégoire, Rémi Hutin et al.POPL 2020 · 77 citations
- Preservation of Speculative Constant-Time by CompilationSantiago Arranz-Olmos, Gilles Barthe, Lionel Blatter, Benjamin Grégoire et al.POPL 2025 · 8 citations
- Constant-time foundations for the new spectre eraSunjay Cauligi, Craig Disselkoen, Klaus von Gleissenthall, Dean M. Tullsen et al.PLDI 2020 · 90 citations
