"Privacy across the boundary": Examining Perceived Privacy Risk Across Data Transmission and Sharing Ranges of Smart Home Personal Assistants
Shuning Zhang, Shixuan Li, Haobin Xing, Jiarui Liu, Yan Kong, Xin Yi, Kanye Ye Wang, Hewu Li
Abstract
As Smart Home Personal Assistants (SPAs) evolve into social agents, understanding user privacy necessitates interpersonal communication frameworks, such as Privacy Boundary Theory (PBT). To ground our investigation, our three-phase preliminary study (1) identified transmission and sharing ranges as key boundary-related risk factors, (2) categorized relevant SPA functions and data types, and (3) analyzed commercial practices, revealing widespread data sharing and non-transparent safeguards. A subsequent mixed-methods study (N=412 survey, N=40 interviews among the survey participants) assessed users’ perceived privacy risks across data types, transmission ranges and sharing ranges. Results demonstrate a significant, non-linear escalation in perceived risk when data crosses two critical boundaries: the ‘public network’ (transmission) and ‘third parties’ (sharing). This boundary effect holds robustly across data types and demographics. Furthermore, risk perception is modulated by data attributes (e.g., social relational data), and contextual privacy calculus. Conversely, anonymization safeguards show limited efficacy especially for third-party sharing, a finding attributed to user distrust. These findings empirically ground PBT in the SPA context and inform design of boundary-aware privacy protection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3db9c02a-09a2-4a0a-b097-a1897c89a645Builds on27
- Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home ApplicationsEarlence Fernandes, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashS&P 2016 · 684 citations
- Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User StudyEric Zeng, Franziska RoesnerUSENIX Security 2019 · 190 citations
- Privacy Norms for Smart Home Personal AssistantsNoura Abdi, Xiao Zhan, Kopo M. Ramokapane, Jose M. SuchCHI 2021 · 107 citations
- Amazon vs. My Brother: How Users of Shared Smart Speakers Perceive and Cope with Privacy RisksYue Huang, Borke Obada-Obieh, Konstantin BeznosovCHI 2020 · 92 citations
- Investigating Users' Preferences and Expectations for Always-Listening Voice AssistantsMadiha Tabassum, Tomasz Kosinski, Alisa Frik, Nathan Malkin et al.UbiComp 2020 · 74 citations
Related papers
- "It's the Company, the Government, You and I": User Perceptions of Responsibility for Smart Home Privacy and SecurityJulie M. Haney, Yasemin Acar, Susanne FurmanUSENIX Security 2021 · 49 citations
- Decide Yourself or Delegate - User Preferences Regarding the Autonomy of Personal Privacy Assistants in Private IoT-Equipped EnvironmentsKarola Marky, Alina Stöver, Sarah Prange, Kira Bleck et al.CHI 2024 · 12 citations
- Exploring the Negotiation Behaviors of Owners and Bystanders over Data Practices of Smart Home DevicesAhmed Alshehri, Eugin Pahk, Joseph Spielman, Jacob T. Parker et al.CHI 2023 · 17 citations
- Smart Home Beyond the Home: A Case for Community-Based Access ControlMadiha Tabassum, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heather Richter LipfordCHI 2020 · 45 citations
- Owning and Sharing: Privacy Perceptions of Smart Speaker UsersNicole Meng, Dilara Keküllüoglu, Kami VanieaCSCW 2021 · 50 citations
