Lune

EMNLP Findings2023

Information Extraction from Legal Wills: How Well Does GPT-4 Do?

Alice Saebom Kwak, Cheonkam Jeong, Gaetano Forte, Derek E. Bambauer, Clayton T. Morrison, Mihai Surdeanu

Abstract

This work presents a manually annotated dataset for Information Extraction (IE) from legal wills, and relevant in-context learning experiments on the dataset. The dataset consists of entities, binary relations between the entities (e.g., relations between testator and beneficiary), and n-ary events (e.g., bequest) extracted from 45 legal wills from two US states. This dataset can serve as a foundation for downstream tasks in the legal domain. Another use case of this dataset is evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) on this IE task. We evaluated GPT-4 with our dataset to investigate its ability to extract information from legal wills. Our evaluation result demonstrates that the model is capable of handling the task reasonably well. When given instructions and examples as a prompt, GPT-4 shows decent performance for both entity extraction and relation extraction tasks. Nevertheless, the evaluation result also reveals that the model is not perfect. We observed inconsistent outputs (given a prompt) as well as prompt over-generalization.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on4

  1. Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractorsMonica Agrawal, Stefan Hegselmann, Hunter Lang, Yoon Kim et al.EMNLP 2022 · 285 citations
  2. Thinking about GPT-3 In-Context Learning for Biomedical IE? Think AgainBernal Jimenez Gutierrez, Nikolas McNeal, Clayton Washington, You Chen et al.EMNLP Findings 2022 · 115 citations
  3. Automated Refugee Case Analysis: A NLP Pipeline for Supporting Legal PractitionersClaire Barale, Michael Rovatsos, Nehal BhutaACL Findings 2023 · 7 citations
  4. Validity Assessment of Legal Will Statements as Natural Language InferenceAlice Saebom Kwak, Jacob O. Israelsen, Clayton T. Morrison, Derek E. Bambauer et al.EMNLP Findings 2022 · 5 citations

Related papers

  1. LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language ModelsZhiwei Fei, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Fengzhe Zhou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 59 citations
  2. ICL-D3IE: In-Context Learning with Diverse Demonstrations Updating for Document Information ExtractionJiabang He, Lei Wang, Yi Hu, Ning Liu et al.ICCV 2023 · 61 citations
  3. Lawma: The Power of Specialization for Legal AnnotationRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Vedant Nanda, Rediet Abebe, Stefan Bechtold et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
  4. ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language ModelsMartina Miliani, Serena Auriemma, Alessandro Bondielli, Emmanuele Chersoni et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 4 citations
  5. GSAP-ERE: Fine-Grained Scholarly Entity and Relation Extraction Focused on Machine LearningWolfgang Otto, Lu Gan, Sharmila Upadhyaya, Saurav Karmakar et al.AAAI 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines