Limitations of Normalization in Attention
Timur Mudarisov, Mikhail Burtsev, Tatiana Petrova, Radu State
Abstract
This paper investigates the limitations of the normalization in attention mechanisms. We begin with a theoretical framework that enables the identification of the model's selective ability and the geometric separation involved in token selection. Our analysis includes explicit bounds on distances and separation criteria for token vectors under softmax scaling. Through experiments with pre-trained GPT-2 model, we empirically validate our theoretical results and analyze key behaviors of the attention mechanism. Notably, we demonstrate that as the number of selected tokens increases, the model's ability to distinguish informative tokens declines, often converging toward a uniform selection pattern. We also show that gradient sensitivity under softmax normalization presents challenges during training, especially at low temperature settings. These findings advance current understanding of softmax-based attention mechanism and motivate the need for more robust normalization and selection strategies in future attention architectures.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3b3aba30-d8ce-4278-a17f-0be637c74510Cited by top-tier papers3
- Improving Sparse Autoencoder with Dynamic AttentionDongsheng Wang, Jinsen Zhang, Dawei Su, Hui HuangCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit RegularizationAmir Mehrpanah, Matteo Gamba, Hossein AzizpourICML 2026
- Modelling Attention with Aitchison Geometry: Token Distinguishability and Temperature ScalingSam Hilton-Jones, Timothy Norman, Zhanxing ZhuICML 2026
Builds on4
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Big Bird: Transformers for Longer SequencesManzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,159 citations
- Reformer: The Efficient TransformerNikita Kitaev, Lukasz Kaiser, Anselm LevskayaICLR 2020 · 2,878 citations
- Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence ModellingJack W. Rae, Anna Potapenko, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Chloe Hillier et al.ICLR 2020 · 833 citations
Related papers
- Softmax as Linear Attention in the Large-Prompt Regime: a Measure-based PerspectiveEtienne Boursier, Claire BoyerICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Self-Adjust SoftmaxChuanyang Zheng, Yihang Gao, Guoxuan Chen, Han Shi et al.EMNLP 2025
- Max-Margin Token Selection in Attention MechanismDavoud Ataee Tarzanagh, Yingcong Li, Xuechen Zhang, Samet OymakNeurIPS 2023 · 67 citations
- Consensus Is All You Get: The Role of Attention in TransformersÁlvaro Rodríguez Abella, João Pedro Silvestre, Paulo TabuadaICML 2025
- Affine-Scaled Attention: Towards Flexible and Stable Transformer AttentionJeongin Bae, baeseong park, Gunho Park, Minsub Kim et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
