Affine-Scaled Attention: Towards Flexible and Stable Transformer Attention
Jeongin Bae, baeseong park, Gunho Park, Minsub Kim, Joonhyung Lee, Junhee Yoo, Sunghyeon Woo, Jiwon Ryu, Se Jung Kwon, Dongsoo Lee
Abstract
Transformer attention is typically implemented using softmax normalization, which enforces attention weights with unit sum normalization. While effective in many settings, this constraint can limit flexibility in controlling attention magnitudes and may contribute to overly concentrated or unstable attention patterns during training. Prior work has explored modifications such as attention sinks or gating mechanisms, but these approaches provide only limited or indirect control over attention reweighting. We propose Affine-Scaled Attention, a simple extension to standard attention that introduces input-dependent scaling and a corresponding bias term applied to softmax-normalized attention weights. This design relaxes the strict normalization constraint while maintaining aggregation of value representations, allowing the model to adjust both the relative distribution and the scale of attention in a controlled manner. We empirically evaluate Affine-Scaled Attention in large-scale language model pretraining across multiple model sizes. Experimental results show consistent improvements in training stability, optimization behavior, and downstream task performance compared to standard softmax attention and attention sink baselines. These findings suggest that modest reweighting of attention outputs provides a practical and effective way to improve attention behavior in Transformer models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ac22a6a9-b8a5-44e4-b646-aa0faf6a33baBuilds on11
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention SinksGuangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,714 citations
- Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-FreeZihan Qiu, Zekun Wang, Bo Zheng, Zeyu Huang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 336 citations
- cosFormer: Rethinking Softmax In AttentionZhen Qin, Weixuan Sun, Hui Deng, Dongxu Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 303 citations
- Rethinking Attention with PerformersKrzysztof Marcin Choromanski, Valerii Likhosherstov, David Dohan, Xingyou Song et al.ICLR 2021 · 122 citations
Related papers
- When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical ViewXiangming Gu, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Qian Liu et al.ICLR 2025
- The Structural Origin of Attention Sink: Variance Discrepancy, Super Neurons, and Dimension DisparitySiquan Li, Kaiqi Jiang, Jiacheng Sun, Tianyang HuICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Variance Sensitivity Induces Attention Entropy Collapse and Instability in TransformersJonghyun Hong, Sungyoon LeeEMNLP 2025
- Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention SinksShangwen Sun, Alfredo Canziani, Yann LeCun, Jiachen ZhuICML 2026
- SSA: Improving Performance With a Better Scoring FunctionOmar Naim, Swarnadeep Bhar, Jérôme Bolte, Nicholas AsherACL 2026
