Why So Pessimistic? Estimating Uncertainties for Offline RL through Ensembles, and Why Their Independence Matters
Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Shixiang Shane Gu, Ofir Nachum
Abstract
Motivated by the success of ensembles for uncertainty estimation in supervised learning, we take a renewed look at how ensembles of Q-functions can be leveraged as the primary source of pessimism for offline reinforcement learning (RL). We begin by identifying a critical flaw in a popular algorithmic choice used by many ensemblebased RL algorithms, namely the use of shared pessimistic target values when computing each ensemble member's Bellman error. Through theoretical analyses and construction of examples in toy MDPs, we demonstrate that shared pessimistic targets can paradoxically lead to value estimates that are effectively optimistic. Given this result, we propose MSG, a practical offline RL algorithm that trains an ensemble of Q-functions with independently computed targets based on completely separate networks, and optimizes a policy with respect to the lower confidence bound of predicted action values. Our experiments on the popular D4RL and RL Unplugged offline RL benchmarks demonstrate that on challenging domains such as antmazes, MSG with deep ensembles surpasses highly well-tuned state-of-the-art methods by a wide margin. Additionally, through ablations on benchmarks domains, we verify the critical significance of using independently trained Q-functions, and study the role of ensemble size. Finally, as using separate networks per ensemble member can become computationally costly with larger neural network architectures, we investigate whether efficient ensemble approximations developed for supervised learning can be similarly effective, and demonstrate that they do not match the performance and robustness of MSG with separate networks, highlighting the need for new efforts into efficient uncertainty estimation directed at RL. Our codebase can be found at https://github.com/google-research/ google-research/tree/master/jrl .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3b17527d-8221-4a57-affd-4bd345987ce1Cited by top-tier papers37
- Supervised Pretraining Can Learn In-Context Reinforcement LearningJonathan Lee, Annie Xie, Aldo Pacchiano, Yash Chandak et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 170 citations
- Revisiting the Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningDenis Tarasov, Vladislav Kurenkov, Alexander Nikulin, Sergey KolesnikovNeurIPS 2023 · 148 citations
- RORL: Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning via Conservative SmoothingRui Yang, Chenjia Bai, Xiaoteng Ma, Zhaoran Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 118 citations
- Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- Offline RL Policies Should Be Trained to be AdaptiveDibya Ghosh, Anurag Ajay, Pulkit Agrawal, Sergey LevineICML 2022 · 62 citations
Builds on16
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- BatchEnsemble: an Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong LearningYeming Wen, Dustin Tran, Jimmy BaICLR 2020 · 569 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
- Dynamic Uncertainty Estimation for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiesheng Wang, Lin Li, Wei Wei, Yujia Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement LearningChenjia Bai, Lingxiao Wang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhi-Hong Deng et al.ICLR 2022 · 173 citations
- Model-Bellman Inconsistency for Model-based Offline Reinforcement LearningYihao Sun, Jiaji Zhang, Chengxing Jia, Haoxin Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 61 citations
- SUMO: Search-Based Uncertainty Estimation for Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningZhongjian Qiao, Jiafei Lyu, Kechen Jiao, Qi Liu et al.AAAI 2025 · 12 citations
