Offline RL Policies Should Be Trained to be Adaptive
Dibya Ghosh, Anurag Ajay, Pulkit Agrawal, Sergey Levine
Abstract
Offline RL algorithms must account for the fact that the dataset they are provided may leave many facets of the environment unknown. The most common way to approach this challenge is to employ pessimistic or conservative methods, which avoid behaviors that are too dissimilar from those in the training dataset. However, relying exclusively on conservatism has drawbacks: performance is sensitive to the exact degree of conservatism, and conservative objectives can recover highly suboptimal policies. In this work, we propose that offline RL methods should instead be adaptive in the presence of uncertainty. We show that acting optimally in offline RL in a Bayesian sense involves solving an implicit POMDP. As a result, optimal policies for offline RL must be adaptive, depending not just on the current state but rather all the transitions seen so far during evaluation. We present a model-free algorithm for approximating this optimal adaptive policy, and demonstrate the efficacy of learning such adaptive policies in offline RL benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0d592748-db3a-4bfc-a9ee-5c4e0e34208cCited by top-tier papers33
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Hierarchical Diffusion for Offline Decision MakingWenhao Li, Xiangfeng Wang, Bo Jin, Hongyuan ZhaICML 2023 · 80 citations
- Anti-Exploration by Random Network DistillationAlexander Nikulin, Vladislav Kurenkov, Denis Tarasov, Sergey KolesnikovICML 2023 · 55 citations
- Adaptive Policy Learning for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement LearningHan Zheng, Xufang Luo, Pengfei Wei, Xuan Song et al.AAAI 2023 · 47 citations
- Train Once, Get a Family: State-Adaptive Balances for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement LearningShenzhi Wang, Qisen Yang, Jiawei Gao, Matthieu Gaetan Lin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 41 citations
Builds on11
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
Related papers
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
- RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningMarc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick HawesNeurIPS 2022 · 168 citations
- Reflect-then-Plan: Offline Model-Based Planning through a Doubly Bayesian LensJihwan Jeong, Xiaoyu Wang, Jingmin Wang, Scott Sanner et al.ICML 2025
- Conservative Bayesian Model-Based Value Expansion for Offline Policy OptimizationJihwan Jeong, Xiaoyu Wang, Michael Gimelfarb, Hyunwoo Kim et al.ICLR 2023
- Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics BeliefKaiyang Guo, Yunfeng Shao, Yanhui GengNeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
