Secure Multi-party Computation of Differentially Private Heavy Hitters
Jonas Böhler, Florian Kerschbaum
Abstract
Private learning of top-k, i.e., the k most frequent values also called heavy hitters, is a common industry scenario: Companies want to privately learn, e.g., frequently typed new words to improve suggestions on mobile devices, often used browser settings, telemetry data of frequent crashes, heavily shared articles, etc. Real-world deployments often use local differential privacy, where distributed users share locally randomized data with an untrusted server. Central differential privacy, on the other hand, assumes access to the raw data and applies the randomization only once, on the aggregated result. These solutions either require large amounts of users for high accuracy (local model) or a trusted third party (central model).We present multi-party computation protocols HH and PEM of sketches (succinct data structures) to efficiently compute differentially private top-k: HH has running time linear in the size of the data and is applicable for very small data sets (hundreds of values), and PEM is sublinear in the data domain and provides better accuracy than HH for large data sizes. Our approaches are efficient (practical running time, requiring no output reconstruction as other sketches) and more accurate than local differential privacy even for a small number of users. In our experiments we were able to securely compute differentially private top-k in less than 10 minutes using 3 semi-honest computation parties distributed over the Internet with inputs from hundreds of users (HH) and input size that is independent of the user count (PEM, excluding count aggregation).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers14
- Federated Boosted Decision Trees with Differential PrivacySamuel Maddock, Graham Cormode, Tianhao Wang, Carsten Maple et al.CCS 2022 · 31 citations
- Sanitizing Sentence Embeddings (and Labels) for Local Differential PrivacyMinxin Du, Xiang Yue, Sherman S. M. Chow, Huan SunWWW 2023 · 26 citations
- Distributed, Private, Sparse Histograms in the Two-Server ModelJames Bell, Adrià Gascón, Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar et al.CCS 2022 · 19 citations
- Interactive Proofs For Differentially Private CountingAri Biswas, Graham CormodeCCS 2023 · 10 citations
- Private Analytics via Streaming, Sketching, and Silently Verifiable ProofsMayank Rathee, Yuwen Zhang, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, Raluca Ada PopaS&P 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on7
- Is Interaction Necessary for Distributed Private Learning?Adam D. Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta, Jalaj UpadhyayS&P 2017 · 159 citations
- Composing Differential Privacy and Secure Computation: A Case Study on Scaling Private Record LinkageXi He, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Cheryl J. Flynn, Divesh SrivastavaCCS 2017 · 115 citations
- Differentially Private Password Frequency ListsJeremiah Blocki, Anupam Datta, Joseph BonneauNDSS 2016 · 62 citations
- Crypt?: Crypto-Assisted Differential Privacy on Untrusted ServersAmrita Roy Chowdhury, Chenghong Wang, Xi He, Ashwin Machanavajjhala et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 40 citations
- MP-SPDZ: A Versatile Framework for Multi-Party ComputationMarcel KellerCCS 2020 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Secure Multi-party Computation of Differentially Private MedianJonas Böhler, Florian KerschbaumUSENIX Security 2020
- Frequency Estimation under Local Differential PrivacyGraham Cormode, Samuel Maddock, Carsten MapleVLDB 2021 · 70 citations
- Lightweight Techniques for Private Heavy HittersDan Boneh, Elette Boyle, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, Niv Gilboa et al.S&P 2021 · 134 citations
- Differentially Private Selection from Secure Distributed ComputingIvan Damgård, Hannah Keller, Boel Nelson, Claudio Orlandi et al.WWW 2024 · 3 citations
- DPSW-Sketch: A Differentially Private Sketch Framework for Frequency Estimation over Sliding WindowsYiping Wang, Yanhao Wang, Cen ChenKDD 2024 · 2 citations
