Lune

CHI2025Top-tier venue

Chatbots for Data Collection in Surveys: A Comparison of Four Theory-Based Interview Probes

Rune Møberg Jacobsen, Samuel Rhys Cox, Carla F. Griggio, Niels van Berkel

2025Year
26Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

Surveys are a widespread method for collecting data at scale, but their rigid structure often limits the depth of qualitative insights obtained. While interviews naturally yield richer responses, they are challenging to conduct across diverse locations and large participant pools. To partially bridge this gap, we investigate the potential of using LLM-based chatbots to support qualitative data collection through interview probes embedded in surveys. We assess four theory-based interview probes: descriptive, idiographic, clarifying, and explanatory. Through a split-plot study design (N = 64), we compare the probes' impact on response quality and user experience across three key stages of HCI research: exploration, requirements gathering, and evaluation. Our results show that probes facilitate the collection of high-quality survey data, with specific probes proving effective at different research stages. We contribute practical and methodological implications for using chatbots as research tools to enrich qualitative data collection.

• Human-centered computing → User studies; Empirical studies in HCI.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on5

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines