Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?
Michiel van der Meer, Piek Vossen, Catholijn M. Jonker, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah
Abstract
Disagreements are common in online discussions. Disagreement may foster collaboration and improve the quality of a discussion under some conditions. Although there exist methods for recognizing disagreement, a deeper understanding of factors that influence disagreement is lacking in the literature. We investigate a hypothesis that differences in personal values are indicative of disagreement in online discussions. We show how state-of-the-art models can be used for estimating values in online discussions and how the estimated values can be aggregated into value profiles. We evaluate the estimated value profiles based on human-annotated agreement labels. We find that the dissimilarity of value profiles correlates with disagreement in specific cases. We also find that including value information in agreement prediction improves performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 396df3e9-bcba-478a-9dbd-f79dfda6da66Cited by top-tier papers5
- Annotator-Centric Active Learning for Subjective NLP TasksMichiel van der Meer, Neele Falk, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah, Enrico LiscioEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- SOLAR: Towards Characterizing Subjectivity of Individuals through Modeling Value Conflicts and Trade-offsYounghun Lee, Dan GoldwasserEMNLP 2025
- Dialogue Systems for Emotional Support via Value ReinforcementJuhee Kim, Chunghu Mok, Jisun Lee, Hyang Sook Kim et al.ACL 2025
- Mining the uncertainty patterns of humans and models in the annotation of moral foundations and human valuesNeele Falk, Gabriella LapesaACL 2025
- That is Unacceptable: the Moral Foundations of CancelingSoda Marem Lo, Oscar Araque, Rajesh Sharma, Marco Antonio StranisciACL 2025
Builds on11
- Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive ComputingFederico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Valerio BasileAAAI 2023 · 236 citations
- SCRUPLES: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32, 000 Real-Life AnecdotesNicholas Lourie, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2021 · 147 citations
- ValueNet: A New Dataset for Human Value Driven Dialogue SystemLiang Qiu, Yizhou Zhao, Jinchao Li, Pan Lu et al.AAAI 2022 · 51 citations
- Not All Claims are Created Equal: Choosing the Right Statistical Approach to Assess HypothesesErfan Sadeqi Azer, Daniel Khashabi, Ashish Sabharwal, Dan RothACL 2020 · 18 citations
- What does a Text Classifier Learn about Morality? An Explainable Method for Cross-Domain Comparison of Moral RhetoricEnrico Liscio, Oscar Araque, Lorenzo Gatti, Ionut Constantinescu et al.ACL 2023 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Value Profiles for Encoding Human VariationTaylor Sorensen, Pushkar Mishra, Roma Patel, Michael Henry Tessler et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Understanding Conflicts in Online ConversationsSharon Levy, Robert E. Kraut, Jane A. Yu, Kristen M. Altenburger et al.WWW 2022 · 17 citations
- When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective TasksEve Fleisig, Rediet Abebe, Dan KleinEMNLP 2023 · 11 citations
- STABLEVAL: Disagreement-Aware and Stable Evaluation of AI SystemsSailendra Akash Bonagiri, Gerard Anderias, Saee Patil, Angelina Lai et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Improving (Dis)agreement Detection with Inductive Social Relation Information From Comment-Reply InteractionsYun Luo, Zihan Liu, Stan Z. Li, Yue ZhangWWW 2023 · 10 citations
