Peer Produced Friction: How Page Protection on Wikipedia Affects Editor Engagement and Concentration
Leah Ajmani, Nicholas Vincent, Stevie Chancellor
Abstract
Peer production systems have frictions-mechanisms that make contributing more effortful-to prevent vandalism and protect information quality. Page protection on Wikipedia is a mechanism where the platform's core values conflict, but there is little quantitative work to ground deliberation. In this paper, we empirically explore the consequences of page protection on Internet Culture articles on Wikipedia (6,264 articles, 108 edit-protected). We first qualitatively analyzed 150 requests for page protection, finding that page protection is motivated by an article's (1) activity, (2) topic area, and (3) visibility. These findings informed a matching approach to compare protected pages and similar unprotected articles. We quantitatively evaluate the differences between protected and unprotected pages across two dimensions: editor engagement and contributor concentration. Protected articles show different trends in editor engagement and equity amongst contributors, affecting the overall disparity in the population. We discuss the role of friction in online platforms, new ways to measure it, and future work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Whose Knowledge is Valued? Epistemic Injustice in CSCW ApplicationsLeah Hope Ajmani, Jasmine C. Foriest, Jordan Taylor, Kyle Pittman et al.CSCW 2024 · 29 citations
- Wikipedia in Wartime: Experiences of Wikipedians Maintaining Articles About the Russia-Ukraine WarLaura Kurek, Ceren Budak, Eric GilbertCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Life Histories of Taboo Knowledge ArtifactsKaylea Champion, Benjamin Mako HillCSCW 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on TwitterShagun Jhaver, Christian Boylston, Diyi Yang, Amy S. BruckmanCSCW 2021 · 168 citations
- Reconsidering Self-Moderation: the Role of Research in Supporting Community-Based Models for Online Content ModerationJoseph SeeringCSCW 2020 · 151 citations
- Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook et al.CSCW 2021 · 116 citations
- Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform GovernanceJenny Fan, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2020 · 90 citations
- ORES: Lowering Barriers with Participatory Machine Learning in WikipediaAaron Halfaker, R. Stuart GeigerCSCW 2020 · 84 citations
Related papers
- The Risks, Benefits, and Consequences of Prepublication Moderation: Evidence from 17 Wikipedia Language EditionsChau Tran, Kaylea Champion, Benjamin Mako Hill, Rachel GreenstadtCSCW 2022 · 4 citations
- Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from TorChau Tran, Kaylea Champion, Andrea Forte, Benjamin Mako Hill et al.S&P 2020 · 14 citations
- Wikipedia Beyond the English Language Edition: How do Editors Collaborate in the Farsi and Chinese Wikipedias?Taryn Bipat, Negin Alimohammadi, Yihan Yu, David W. McDonald et al.CSCW 2021 · 3 citations
- Beyond Access: Contextualizing the Benefits of Broadband through Contributor Dynamics on WikipediaYaxuan Yin, Jacob Thebault-SpiekerCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Working for the Invisible Machines or Pumping Information into an Empty Void? An Exploration of Wikidata Contributors' MotivationsCharles Chuankai Zhang, Mo Houtti, C. Estelle Smith, Ruoyan Kong et al.CSCW 2022 · 9 citations
