Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamics
Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Tegan Maharaj, David Krueger, Sara Hooker
Abstract
Modern machine learning research relies on relatively few carefully curated datasets. Even in these datasets, and typically in `untidy' or raw data, practitioners are faced with significant issues of data quality and diversity which can be prohibitively labor intensive to address. Existing methods for dealing with these challenges tend to make strong assumptions about the particular issues at play, and often require a priori knowledge or metadata such as domain labels. Our work is orthogonal to these methods: we instead focus on providing a unified and efficient framework for Metadata Archaeology -- uncovering and inferring metadata of examples in a dataset. We curate different subsets of data that might exist in a dataset (e.g. mislabeled, atypical, or out-of-distribution examples) using simple transformations, and leverage differences in learning dynamics between these probe suites to infer metadata of interest. Our method is on par with far more sophisticated mitigation methods across different tasks: identifying and correcting mislabeled examples, classifying minority-group samples, prioritizing points relevant for training and enabling scalable human auditing of relevant examples.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 11 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- On the Challenges of Using Black-Box APIs for Toxicity Evaluation in ResearchLuiza Pozzobon, Beyza Ermis, Patrick Lewis, Sara HookerEMNLP 2023 · 19 citations
- Improving Few-Shot Generalization by Exploring and Exploiting Auxiliary DataAlon Albalak, Colin A. Raffel, William Yang WangNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- The Value of Out-of-Distribution DataAshwin De Silva, Rahul Ramesh, Carey E. Priebe, Pratik Chaudhari et al.ICML 2023 · 16 citations
- From Dormant to Deleted: Tamper-Resistant Unlearning Through Weight-Space RegularizationShoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Adrian Weller, David Krueger, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- TRIAGE: Characterizing and auditing training data for improved regressionNabeel Seedat, Jonathan Crabbé, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
Builds on20
- DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningJunnan Li, Richard Socher, Steven C. H. HoiICLR 2020 · 1,326 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence EstimationVitaly Feldman, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
- An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious CorrelationsShiori Sagawa, Aditi Raghunathan, Pang Wei Koh, Percy LiangICML 2020 · 436 citations
Related papers
- Metam: Goal-Oriented Data DiscoverySainyam Galhotra, Yue Gong, Raul Castro FernandezICDE 2023 · 28 citations
- DeMix: Debugging Training Data with Mixed Data Error Types by Investigating Influence VectorsJiale Deng, Yanyan Shen, Xiaogang Shi, Junjun ChaiKDD 2026
- DataRater: Meta-Learned Dataset CurationDan Andrei Calian, Gregory Farquhar, Iurii Kemaev, Luisa M. Zintgraf et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data SelectionSaachi Jain, Kimia Hamidieh, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training DataEsther Rolf, Theodora T. Worledge, Benjamin Recht, Michael I. JordanICML 2021 · 50 citations
