Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzing
Tong Wang, Taotao Gu, Huan Deng, Hu Li, Xiaohui Kuang, Gang Zhao
Abstract
As autonomous driving systems (ADS) advance towards higher levels of autonomy, orchestrating their safety verification becomes increasingly intricate. This paper unveils ScenarioFuzz, a pioneering scenario-based fuzz testing methodology. Designed like a choreographer who understands the past performances, it uncovers vulnerabilities in ADS without the crutch of predefined scenarios. Leveraging map road networks, such as OPENDRIVE, we extract essential data to form a foundational scenario seed corpus. This corpus, enriched with pertinent information, provides the necessary boundaries for fuzz testing in the absence of starting scenarios. Our approach integrates specialized mutators and mutation techniques, combined with a graph neural network model, to predict and filter out high-risk scenario seeds, optimizing the fuzzing process using historical test data. Compared to other methods, our approach reduces the time cost by an average of 60.3%, while the number of error scenarios discovered per unit of time increases by 103%. Furthermore, we propose a self-supervised collision trajectory clustering method, which aids in identifying and summarizing 54 high-risk scenario categories prone to inducing ADS faults. Our experiments have successfully uncovered 58 bugs across six tested systems, emphasizing the critical safety concerns of ADS. CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Modeling and simulation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 361fd6b0-420b-4807-a6fc-7fa067e3bcbeCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingKashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash, Andreas GeigerICCV 2021 · 274 citations
- On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous VehiclesQingzhao Zhang, Shengtuo Hu, Jiachen Sun, Qi Alfred Chen et al.CVPR 2022 · 132 citations
- Efficient Online Testing for DNN-Enabled Systems using Surrogate-Assisted and Many-Objective OptimizationFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2022 · 77 citations
- DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided FuzzingSeulbae Kim, Major Liu, Junghwan John Rhee, Yuseok Jeon et al.CCS 2022 · 65 citations
- BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving SystemsMingfei Cheng, Yuan Zhou, Xiaofei XieISSTA 2023 · 59 citations
Related papers
- MG-Fuzz: Model-Guided Fuzzing for Unsafe Scenario Discovery in Autonomous Driving SystemsYulong Lyu, Ruiqi Hong, Jiawan Wang, Jun Sun et al.ISSTA 2026
- SCTrans: Constructing a Large Public Scenario Dataset for Simulation Testing of Autonomous Driving SystemsJiarun Dai, Bufan Gao, Mingyuan Luo, Zongan Huang et al.ICSE 2024 · 8 citations
- LawBreaker: An Approach for Specifying Traffic Laws and Fuzzing Autonomous VehiclesYang Sun, Christopher M. Poskitt, Jun Sun, Yuqi Chen et al.ASE 2022 · 46 citations
- Curiosity-Driven Testing for Sequential Decision-Making ProcessJunda He, Zhou Yang, Jieke Shi, Chengran Yang et al.ICSE 2024 · 6 citations
- SoVAR: Build Generalizable Scenarios from Accident Reports for Autonomous Driving TestingAn Guo, Yuan Zhou, Haoxiang Tian, Chunrong Fang et al.ASE 2024 · 12 citations
