Neural networks trained with SGD learn distributions of increasing complexity
Maria Refinetti, Alessandro Ingrosso, Sebastian Goldt
Abstract
The uncanny ability of over-parameterised neural networks to generalise well has been explained using various ‘simplicity biases’. These theories postulate that neural networks avoid overfitting by first fitting simple, linear classifiers before learning more complex, non-linear functions. Meanwhile, data structure is also recognised as a key ingredient for good generalisation, yet its role in simplicity bias is not yet understood. Here, we show that neural networks trained using stochastic gradient descent initially classify their inputs using lower-order input statistics, such as mean and covariance, and exploit higher-order statistics only later during training. We first demonstrate this distributional simplicity bias (DSB) in a solvable model of a single neuron trained on synthetic data. We then demonstrate DSB empirically in a range of deep convolutional networks and visual transformers trained on CIFAR10, and show that it even holds in networks pre-trained on ImageNet. We discuss the relation of DSB to other simplicity biases and consider its implications for the principle of Gaussian universality in learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3529deae-a1bf-4a0f-b872-c8ce45ce4eabCited by top-tier papers23
- Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-trainingMelody Zixuan Li, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Arna Ghosh, Komal Kumar Teru et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 38 citations
- A distributional simplicity bias in the learning dynamics of transformersRiccardo Rende, Federica Gerace, Alessandro Laio, Sebastian GoldtNeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
- The Simplicity Bias in Multi-Task RNNs: Shared Attractors, Reuse of Dynamics, and Geometric RepresentationElia Turner, Omri BarakNeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
- Neural Networks Learn Statistics of Increasing ComplexityNora Belrose, Quintin Pope, Lucia Quirke, Alex Mallen et al.ICML 2024 · 24 citations
- Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics Explains A Simplicity Bias Across Neural Network ArchitecturesYedi Zhang, Andrew M. Saxe, Peter E. LathamICLR 2026 · 15 citations
Builds on18
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural NetworksKaifeng Lyu, Jian LiICLR 2020 · 402 citations
- The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on LearningPhillip Pope, Chen Zhu, Ahmed Abdelkader, Micah Goldblum et al.ICLR 2021 · 381 citations
- Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural NetworksBlake Bordelon, Abdulkadir Canatar, Cengiz PehlevanICML 2020 · 245 citations
Related papers
- A Fourier perspective on the learning dynamics of neural networks: from sample complexities to mechanistic insightsFabiola Ricci, Claudia Merger, Sebastian GoldtICML 2026
- Simplicity Bias in Overparameterized Machine LearningYakir BerchenkoAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- Evading the Simplicity Bias: Training a Diverse Set of Models Discovers Solutions with Superior OOD GeneralizationDamien Teney, Ehsan Abbasnejad, Simon Lucey, Anton van den HengelCVPR 2022 · 32 citations
- Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random FunctionsDamien Teney, Armand Mihai Nicolicioiu, Valentin Hartmann, Ehsan AbbasnejadCVPR 2024 · 7 citations
- Linear CNNs Discover the Statistical Structure of the Dataset Using Only the Most Dominant FrequenciesHannah Pinson, Joeri Lenaerts, Vincent GinisICML 2023 · 8 citations
