Divergence-Aware Testing of Graphics Shader Compiler Back-Ends
Dongwei Xiao, Shuai Wang, Zhibo Liu, Yiteng Peng, Daoyuan Wu, Zhendong Su
Abstract
Graphics shaders are the core of modern 3D visual effects, enabling developers to create realistic, real-time rendering of 3D scenes. Shaders are specialized programs written in high-level shading languages like GLSL, and graphics shader compilers translate these high-level shader programs into low-level binaries that run on GPUs. These shader compilers are complex programs with multiple layers: front-end, middle-end, and back-end. Despite significant development efforts from industrial GPU vendors such as NVIDIA and AMD, graphics shader compilers still contain bugs that can impact downstream applications and lead to negative consequences from poor user experience in entertainment to accidents in driving assistance systems. Because they are complex and deep in the compilation pipeline, the back-ends of shader compilers are particularly challenging to test. Our empirical exploration shows that state-of-the-art testing tools for shader compilers do not specifically target the back-ends and are thus ineffective in uncovering back-end bugs. This work fills this gap and introduces ShaDiv , an automated testing tool specifically designed to uncover bugs in the back-ends of graphics shader compilers. To this end, ShaDiv generates test inputs with two novel, carefully designed strategies to support the unique computational models of the back-ends, namely control and data flow divergence among GPU threads. ShaDiv deliberately perturbs divergence patterns in both the control and data flow of shader programs to effectively trigger back-end optimizations. Our evaluation of ShaDiv on graphics shader compilers from four mainstream GPU vendors uncovered 12 back-end bugs. Further comparison with existing shader compiler testing tools shows that ShaDiv achieves a 25% coverage increase in the back-end components and finds four times as many back-end bugs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Extraction and Mutation at a High Level: Template-Based Fuzzing for JavaScript EnginesWai Kin Wong, Dongwei Xiao, Anthony Cheuk Tung Lai, Yiteng Peng et al.OOPSLA 2025 · 4 citations
- Characterizing Real-World Bugs in Tile Programs for Automated Bug DetectionRavishka Rathnasuriya, Zihe Song, Nidhi Majoju, Tingxi Li et al.ISSTA 2026
Builds on20
- Random testing for C and C++ compilers with YARPGenVsevolod Livinskii, Dmitry Babokin, John RegehrOOPSLA 2020 · 140 citations
- How far we have come: testing decompilation correctness of C decompilersZhibo Liu, Shuai WangISSTA 2020 · 53 citations
- GrayC: Greybox Fuzzing of Compilers and Analysers for CKarine Even-Mendoza, Arindam Sharma, Alastair F. Donaldson, Cristian CadarISSTA 2023 · 52 citations
- Finding missed optimizations through the lens of dead code eliminationTheodoros Theodoridis, Manuel Rigger, Zhendong SuASPLOS 2022 · 48 citations
- Fuzzing Loop Optimizations in Compilers for C++ and Data-Parallel LanguagesVsevolod Livinskii, Dmitry Babokin, John RegehrPLDI 2023 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Metamorphic Shader Fusion for Testing Graphics Shader CompilersDongwei Xiao, Zhibo Liu, Shuai WangICSE 2023 · 12 citations
- Aδ: autodiff for discontinuous programs - applied to shadersYuting Yang, Connelly Barnes, Andrew Adams, Adam FinkelsteinSIGGRAPH 2022 · 17 citations
- An Investigation on Numerical Bugs in GPU Programs Towards Automated Bug DetectionRavishka Rathnasuriya, Nidhi Majoju, Zihe Song, Wei YangISSTA 2025
- DarthShader: Fuzzing WebGPU Shader Translators & CompilersLukas Bernhard, Nico Schiller, Moritz Schloegel, Nils Bars et al.CCS 2024 · 3 citations
- Test-case reduction and deduplication almost for free with transformation-based compiler testingAlastair F. Donaldson, Paul Thomson, Vasyl Teliman, Stefano Milizia et al.PLDI 2021 · 39 citations
