Taking Back Control in an Intermediate Representation for GPU Computing
Vasileios Klimis, Jack Clark, Alan Baker, David Neto, John Wickerson, Alastair F. Donaldson
Abstract
We describe our experiences successfully applying lightweight formal methods to substantially improve and reformulate an important part of Standard Portable Intermediate Representation (SPIR-V), an industrystandard language for GPU computing. The formal model that we present has allowed us to (1) identify several ambiguities and needless complexities in the way that structured control flow was defined in the SPIR-V specification; (2) interact with the authors of the SPIR-V specification to rectify these problems; (3) validate the developer tools and conformance test suites that support the SPIR-V language by cross-checking them against our formal model, improving the tools, test suites, and our models in the process; and (4) develop a novel method for fuzzing SPIR-V compilers to detect miscompilation bugs that leverages our formal model. The latest release of the SPIR-V specification incorporates the revised set of control-flow definitions that have arisen from our work. Furthermore, our novel compiler-fuzzing technique has led to the discovery of twenty distinct, previously unknown bugs in SPIR-V compilers from Google, the Khronos Group, Intel, and Mozilla. Our work showcases the practical impact that formal modelling and analysis techniques can have on the design and implementation of industry-standard programming languages.
CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → General programming languages; • Social and professional topics → History of programming languages.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9961ea15-eebe-4701-8f90-843d93acec35Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Random testing for C and C++ compilers with YARPGenVsevolod Livinskii, Dmitry Babokin, John RegehrOOPSLA 2020 · 140 citations
- Persistency semantics of the Intel-x86 architectureAzalea Raad, John Wickerson, Gil Neiger, Viktor VafeiadisPOPL 2020 · 61 citations
- Test-case reduction and deduplication almost for free with transformation-based compiler testingAlastair F. Donaldson, Paul Thomson, Vasyl Teliman, Stefano Milizia et al.PLDI 2021 · 39 citations
- Specifying and testing GPU workgroup progress modelsTyler Sorensen, Lucas F. Salvador, Harmit Raval, Hugues Evrard et al.OOPSLA 2021 · 11 citations
- The semantics of shared memory in Intel CPU/FPGA systemsDan Iorga, Alastair F. Donaldson, Tyler Sorensen, John WickersonOOPSLA 2021 · 9 citations
Related papers
- SIMT-Step Execution: A Flexible Operational Semantics for GPU Subgroup BehaviorZheyuan Chen, Naomi Rehman, Guido Martínez, Tyler SorensenPLDI 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Unified Analysis of GPU ConsistencyHaining Tong, Natalia Gavrilenko, Hernán Ponce de León, Keijo HeljankoASPLOS 2024 · 5 citations
- First-Class Verification Dialects for MLIRMathieu Fehr, Yuyou Fan, Hugo Pompougnac, John Regehr et al.PLDI 2025 · 5 citations
- Specification and verification in the field: Applying formal methods to BPF just-in-time compilers in the Linux kernelLuke Nelson, Jacob Van Geffen, Emina Torlak, Xi WangOSDI 2020 · 72 citations
- Ratte: Fuzzing for Miscompilations in Multi-Level Compilers Using Composable SemanticsPingshi Yu, Nicolas Wu, Alastair F. DonaldsonASPLOS 2025 · 3 citations
