City Sampling for Citizens' Assemblies
Paul Gölz, Jan Maly, Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Markus Utke, Philipp C. Verpoort
Abstract
In citizens' assemblies, a group of constituents is randomly selected to weigh in on policy issues. We study a two-stage sampling problem faced by practitioners in countries such as Germany, in which constituents' contact information is stored at a municipal level. As a result, practitioners can only select constituents from a bounded number of cities ex post, while ensuring equal selection probability for constituents ex ante.
We develop several algorithms for this problem. Although minimizing the number of contacted cities is NP-hard, we provide a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm and an additive 1-approximation, both based on separation oracles for a linear programming formulation. Recognizing that practical objectives go beyond minimizing city count, we further introduce a simple and more interpretable greedy algorithm, which additionally satisfies an ex-post monotonicity property and achieves an additive 2-approximation. Finally, we explore a notion of ex-post proportionality, for which we propose two practical algorithms: an optimal algorithm based on column generation and integer linear programming and a simple heuristic creating particularly transparent distributions. We evaluate these algorithms on data from Germany, and plan to deploy them in cooperation with a leading nonprofit organization in this space.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 338acf7e-126c-4c80-bc5a-488e28dff891Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Neutralizing Self-Selection Bias in Sampling for SortitionBailey Flanigan, Paul Gölz, Anupam Gupta, Ariel D. ProcacciaNeurIPS 2020 · 44 citations
- Fair Sortition Made TransparentBailey Flanigan, Gregory Kehne, Ariel D. ProcacciaNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Is Sortition Both Representative and Fair?Soroush Ebadian, Gregory Kehne, Evi Micha, Ariel D. Procaccia et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
- Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' AssembliesBailey Flanigan, Jennifer Liang, Ariel D. Procaccia, Sven WangAAAI 2024 · 15 citations
- Can a Few Decide for Many? The Metric Distortion of SortitionIoannis Caragiannis, Evi Micha, Jannik PetersICML 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Now We're Talking: Better Deliberation Groups through Submodular OptimizationJake Barrett, Kobi Gal, Paul Gölz, Rose M. Hong et al.AAAI 2023 · 4 citations
- Federated AssembliesDaniel Halpern, Ariel D. Procaccia, Ehud Shapiro, Nimrod TalmonAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- Online Proportional ApportionmentJavier Cembrano, José Correa, Svenja M. Griesbach, Victor VerdugoSODA 2026
- Does Representation Guarantee Welfare?Jakob de Raaij, Ariel D. Procaccia, Alexandros PsomasNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- New Combinatorial Insights for Monotone ApportionmentJavier Cembrano, José Correa, Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Alexandros Tsigonias-Dimitriadis et al.SODA 2025
