Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation via Evidential Alignment
Wenqian Ye, Guangtao Zheng, Aidong Zhang
Abstract
Deep neural networks often learn and rely on spurious correlations, i.e., superficial associations between non-causal features and the targets. For instance, an image classifier may identify camels based on the desert backgrounds. While it can yield high overall accuracy during training, it degrades generalization on more diverse scenarios where such correlations do not hold. This problem poses significant challenges for out-of-distribution robustness and trustworthiness. Existing methods typically mitigate this issue by using external group annotations or auxiliary deterministic models to learn unbiased representations. However, such information is costly to obtain, and deterministic models may fail to capture the full spectrum of biases learned by the models. To address these limitations, we propose Evidential Alignment, a novel framework that leverages uncertainty quantification to understand the behavior of the biased models without requiring group annotations. By quantifying the evidence of model prediction with second-order risk minimization and calibrating the biased models with the proposed evidential calibration technique, Evidential Alignment identifies and suppresses spurious correlations while preserving core features. We theoretically justify the effectiveness of our method as capable of learning the patterns of biased models and debiasing the model without requiring any spurious correlation annotations. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly improves group robustness across diverse architectures and data modalities, providing a scalable and principled solution to spurious correlations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 333a0014-463d-46a6-8b22-0bc29424f64eCited by top-tier papers3
- Rectifying Shortcut Behaviors in Preference-based Reward LearningWenqian Ye, Guangtao Zheng, Aidong ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- DeMix: Debugging Training Data with Mixed Data Error Types by Investigating Influence VectorsJiale Deng, Yanyan Shen, Xiaogang Shi, Junjun ChaiKDD 2026
- SAGE: Spuriousness-Aware Guided Prompt Exploration for Mitigating Multimodal BiasWenqian Ye, Di Wang, Guangtao Zheng, Bohan Liu et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on20
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Distributionally Robust Neural NetworksShiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, Percy LiangICLR 2020 · 1,578 citations
- Deep Evidential RegressionAlexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2020 · 777 citations
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
- Learning from Failure: De-biasing Classifier from Biased ClassifierJun Hyun Nam, Hyuntak Cha, Sungsoo Ahn, Jaeho Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
Related papers
- Let Samples Speak: Mitigating Spurious Correlation by Exploiting the Clusterness of SamplesWeiwei Li, Junzhuo Liu, Yuanyuan Ren, Yuchen Zheng et al.CVPR 2025
- Class-Conditional Distribution Balancing for Group Robust ClassificationMiaoyun Zhao, Qiang ZhangICML 2026 · 1 citation
- On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious CorrelationsPavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Nate Gruver, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2022 · 208 citations
- DeNetDM: Debiasing by Network Depth ModulationSilpa Vadakkeeveetil Sreelatha, Adarsh Kappiyath, Abhra Chaudhuri, Anjan DuttaNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept CurationYiwei Yang, Anthony Z. Liu, Robert Wolfe, Aylin Caliskan et al.CVPR 2024
