Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation
Yiwei Yang, Anthony Z. Liu, Robert Wolfe, Aylin Caliskan, Bill Howe
Abstract
Deep neural networks are prone to capture correlations between spurious attributes and class labels, leading to low accuracy on some combinations of class labels and spurious attribute values. When a spurious attribute represents a protected class, these low-accuracy groups can manifest discriminatory bias. Existing methods attempting to improve worst-group accuracy assume the training data, validation data, or both are reliably labeled by the spurious attribute. But a model may be perceived to be biased towards a concept that is not represented by pre-existing labels on the training data. In these situations, the spurious attribute must be defined with external information. We propose Concept Correction, a framework that represents a concept as a curated set of images from any source, then labels each training sample by its similarity to the concept set to control spurious correlations. For example, concept sets representing gender can be used to measure and control gender bias even without explicit labels. We demonstrate and evaluate an instance of the framework as Concept DRO, which uses concept sets to estimate group labels, then uses these labels to train with a state of the art distributively robust optimization objective. We show that Concept DRO outperforms existing methods that do not require labels of spurious attributes by up to 33.1% on three image classification datasets and is competitive with the best methods that assume access to labels. We consider how the size and quality of the concept set influences performance and find that even smaller, manually curated sets of noisy AI-generated images are effective at controlling spurious correlations, suggesting that high-quality, reusable concept sets are easy to create and effective in reducing bias.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
- An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious CorrelationsShiori Sagawa, Aditi Raghunathan, Pang Wei Koh, Percy LiangICML 2020 · 436 citations
- Learning from Failure: De-biasing Classifier from Biased ClassifierJun Hyun Nam, Hyuntak Cha, Sungsoo Ahn, Jaeho Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
- No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification ProblemsNimit Sharad Sohoni, Jared Dunnmon, Geoffrey Angus, Albert Gu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 316 citations
Related papers
- Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution ShiftChunting Zhou, Xuezhe Ma, Paul Michel, Graham NeubigICML 2021 · 78 citations
- Distributionally Robust Neural NetworksShiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, Percy LiangICLR 2020 · 1,578 citations
- Class-Conditional Distribution Balancing for Group Robust ClassificationMiaoyun Zhao, Qiang ZhangICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Correct-N-Contrast: a Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious CorrelationsMichael Zhang, Nimit Sharad Sohoni, Hongyang R. Zhang, Chelsea Finn et al.ICML 2022 · 230 citations
- Let Samples Speak: Mitigating Spurious Correlation by Exploiting the Clusterness of SamplesWeiwei Li, Junzhuo Liu, Yuanyuan Ren, Yuchen Zheng et al.CVPR 2025
