Hierarchical Planning for Complex Tasks with Knowledge Graph-RAG and Symbolic Verification
Flavio Petruzzellis, Cristina Cornelio, Pietro Lio
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as robotic planners but often struggle with long-horizon and complex tasks, especially in specialized environments requiring external knowledge. While hierarchical planning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) address some of these challenges, they remain insufficient on their own and a deeper integration is required for achieving more reliable systems. To this end, we propose a neuro-symbolic approach that enhances LLMs-based planners with Knowledge Graph-based RAG for hierarchical plan generation. This method decomposes complex tasks into manageable subtasks, further expanded into executable atomic action sequences. To ensure formal correctness and proper decomposition, we integrate a Symbolic Validator, which also functions as a failure detector by aligning expected and observed world states. Our evaluation against baseline methods demonstrates the consistent significant advantages of integrating hierarchical planning, symbolic verification, and RAG across tasks of varying complexity and different LLMs. Additionally, our experimental setup and novel metrics not only validate our approach for complex planning but also serve as a tool for assessing LLMs' reasoning and compositional capabilities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3328a1ee-e0a1-4953-b12c-c88a19d1b3d5Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
Related papers
- Towards Reliable Code-as-Policies: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Embodied Task PlanningSanghyun Ahn, Wonje Choi, Junyong Lee, Jinwoo Park et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- DecoVer: A Decompose-and-Verify Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Embodied Task Planning with BC+YiXiang Jiang, Binqian Xu, Xiangbo ShuICML 2026
- LCR-RAG: Enhancing Logical Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Neuro-symbolic Reinforcement LearningWenxiang Zheng, Guo Tang, Shixin Jiang, Liangyu Huo et al.ACL 2026
- Planning in the Dark: LLM-Symbolic Planning Pipeline Without ExpertsSukai Huang, Nir Lipovetzky, Trevor CohnAAAI 2025 · 19 citations
- Enhancing LLM Planning for Robotics Manipulation through Hierarchical Procedural Knowledge GraphsJiacong Zhou, Jiaxu Miao, Xianyun Wang, Jun YuNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
