Intimate Data Sharing: Enhancing Transparency and Control in Fertility Tracking
Anna Ida Hudig, Jatinder Singh
Abstract
Fertility trackers are popular for self-monitoring menstrual cycles and managing other aspects of reproductive or sexual health. However, the intimate nature of fertility tracking raises particular concerns about potential data (mis)use. Our study deepens understandings of fertility tracker data sharing and presents co-created mechanisms to enhance user agency over their data in intimate contexts. To achieve this, we first analysed the network transmissions from eight fertility tracker products, observing that many data transmissions appear to be tied to particular uses of the tracker and that the products communicate with endpoints associated with various organisations across different countries. This raises concerns about how intimate data is governed, used, and shared. To understand user attitudes towards data sharing in intimate contexts, we then conducted a survey exploring factors influencing user data sharing preferences. Our findings reveal that users desire transparency and control mechanisms and that their willingness to share data is influenced by contextual factors, including the third parties involved, the purposes of data collection, and the sensitivity of the data. Building on these findings, we worked with users to co-design ten concrete mechanisms for enhancing data transparency and control throughout fertility tracker product usage lifecycles. In all, our mixed-method study provides an in-depth understanding of fertility tracker data flows and preferences and proposes actionable mechanisms designers can utilise to support and protect data rights in intimate data ecosystems.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 32706d06-4d1d-46f6-b65d-9102ee6207e8Cited by top-tier papers4
- Do We Need Subsidiarity in Software?Louisa Conwill, Megan Levis Scheirer, Walter J. ScheirerCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- "It's Just a Wild, Wild West": Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance MechanismAnna Ida Hudig, Emma Kallina, Jatinder SinghCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Technology in Abortion Care: a Scoping Review on Contexts of Use, Research Methods, Ethical Considerations and ImpactCamille Nadal, Sarah Foley, Katie A. Siek, Kellie Morrissey et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Sharing Women's Health Experiences Influenced by Genetic Factors: Practices, Challenges, and OpportunitiesZiqi Yang, Daniel A. Epstein, Yunan ChenCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- My Body, Their Business: User Perspectives on Commercial Data Practices in FemTech mHealth AppsGhada Alsebayel, Ximena Lucia Lainfiesta, Ayesha Fatima, Giovanni Maria Troiano et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Investigating Culturally Responsive Design for Menstrual Tracking and Sharing Practices Among Individuals with Minimal Sexual EducationGeorgianna E. Lin, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Neha KumarCHI 2022 · 22 citations
- Shared Use of Intimate Technology: A Large-Scale Qualitative Study on the Use of Natural Cycles as a Digital ContraceptiveAiri Lampinen, Madeline Balaam, Deepika Yadav, Nadia Campo Woytuk et al.CSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Understanding Fitness Tracker Users' Security and Privacy Knowledge, Attitudes and BehavioursSandra Gabriele, Sonia ChiassonCHI 2020 · 61 citations
- Usable Anonymity in Reproductive Health PrivacyQiurong Song, Yanlai Wu, Rie Helene Hernandez, Yao Li et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
