Technology in Abortion Care: a Scoping Review on Contexts of Use, Research Methods, Ethical Considerations and Impact
Camille Nadal, Sarah Foley, Katie A. Siek, Kellie Morrissey, Aoife Mullally
Abstract
Globally, about 40% of women and people assigned female at birth live under laws that restrict or prohibit access to safe abortion care. Even where abortion is legal, socio-cultural stigma and health inequities hinder timely, equitable access. Technologies have been developed to support abortion seekers and providers in overcoming barriers to information, safe abortion care, and support. However, research on abortion care technologies is fragmented, spanning medical and computing publications, and lacking a consolidated understanding. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of 92 studies, examining technological applications, contexts of use, research methods, ethical considerations, and pathways to impact. This analysis informs the HCI research agenda for abortion care, highlighting future directions, and fostering reflection on design, ethics, and meaningful impact. We call on HCI researchers to move beyond telemedicine and U.S.-centric perspectives, re-politicize abortion care technologies, and consider temporality in delivering timely abortion care amid broader sociopolitical constraints.
• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); • Applied computing → Health informatics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 87d83219-d969-4cba-805c-563bf75df402Builds on19
- How WEIRD is CHI?Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau et al.CHI 2021 · 254 citations
- Touching and Being in Touch with the Menstruating BodyNadia Campo Woytuk, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Madeline BalaamCHI 2020 · 167 citations
- Using Thematic Analysis in Healthcare HCI at CHI: A Scoping ReviewRobert Bowman, Camille Nadal, Kellie Morrissey, Anja Thieme et al.CHI 2023 · 106 citations
- Designing Menstrual Technologies with AdolescentsMarie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Madeline BalaamCHI 2021 · 104 citations
- Caring for Intimate Data in Fertility TechnologiesMaryam Mehrnezhad, Teresa AlmeidaCHI 2021 · 89 citations
Related papers
- Care-in-Retrograde: Designing for Reproductive Health in the Aftermath of RoeCristina Bosco, Ege Otenen, Patrick C. Shih, Elizabeth KaziunasCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- From Literature to ‘ReWA’: Discussing Reproductive Well-being in HCIHafsah Mahzabin Chowdhury, Sharifa SultanaCSCW 2026
- A Scoping Review of Queer Health and Well-Being Technology ResearchCalvin A. Liang, William W. Liem, Daniel Delmonaco, Andrew B.L. Berry et al.CSCW 2026
- Caring about Care: A Meta-Narrative Review of HCI Research on CareZixuan Wang, Yuanrong Guo, Eilidh Bowman, Yuxiang Zhai et al.CHI 2026 · 6 citations
- What do we mean by social support? A systematic review of HCI research investigating and designing for social supportXuanyu Liu, Joseph Heger, Irene Yu, Gabriela MarcuCHI 2026 · 1 citation
