Multi-agent Online Scheduling: MMS Allocations for Indivisible Items
Shengwei Zhou, Rufan Bai, Xiaowei Wu
Abstract
We consider the problem of fairly allocating a sequence of indivisible items that arrive online in an arbitrary order to a group of n agents with additive normalized valuation functions. We consider both the allocation of goods and chores and propose algorithms for approximating maximin share (MMS) allocations. When agents have identical valuation functions the problem coincides with the semi-online machine covering problem (when items are goods) and load balancing problem (when items are chores), for both of which optimal competitive ratios have been achieved. In this paper, we consider the case when agents have general additive valuation functions. For the allocation of goods, we show that no competitive algorithm exists even when there are only three agents and propose an optimal 0.5-competitive algorithm for the case of two agents. For the allocation of chores, we propose a (2-1/n)-competitive algorithm for n>=3 agents and a square root of 2 (approximately 1.414)-competitive algorithm for two agents. Additionally, we show that no algorithm can do better than 15/11 (approximately 1.364)-competitive for two agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 30f3afeb-f57b-47db-952f-3d5cf713c2a6Cited by top-tier papers3
- Online Fair Allocations with Binary Valuations and BeyondYuanyuan Wang, Tianze WeiAAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Fairness in Repeated Matching: A Maximin PerspectiveEugene Lim, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Nicholas TehAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Promoting External and Internal Equities Under Ex-Ante/Ex-Post Metrics in Online Resource AllocationKarthik Abinav Sankararaman, Aravind Srinivasan, Pan XuICML 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on6
- Almost (Weighted) Proportional Allocations for Indivisible Chores✱✱Bo Li, Yingkai Li, Xiaowei WuWWW 2022 · 46 citations
- Universal and Tight Online Algorithms for Generalized-Mean WelfareSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab MaitiAAAI 2022 · 29 citations
- Approximate Group Fairness for ClusteringBo Li, Lijun Li, Ankang Sun, Chenhao Wang et al.ICML 2021 · 28 citations
- Fair and Efficient Online Allocations with Normalized ValuationsVasilis Gkatzelis, Alexandros Psomas, Xizhi TanAAAI 2021 · 26 citations
- Online Nash Social Welfare Maximization with PredictionsSiddhartha Banerjee, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Artur Gorokh, Billy JinSODA 2022 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Breaking the 3/4 Barrier for Approximate Maximin ShareHannaneh Akrami, Jugal GargSODA 2024 · 26 citations
- All-but-one MMS Allocation for ChoresJiawei Qiu, Xiaowei Wu, Cong Zhang, Shengwei ZhouWWW 2026
- Improved Maximin Share Guarantee for Additive ValuationsEhsan Heidari, Alireza Kaviani, Masoud Seddighin, AmirMohammad ShahrezaeiSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Fair Allocation of Indivisible Chores: Beyond Additive CostsBo Li, Fangxiao Wang, Yu ZhouNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Share-Based Fairness for Arbitrary EntitlementsMoshe Babaioff, Uriel FeigeSTOC 2025 · 10 citations
