Performance Gap in Entity Knowledge Extraction Across Modalities in Vision Language Models
Ido Cohen, Daniela Gottesman, Mor Geva, Raja Giryes
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) excel at extracting and reasoning about information from images. Yet, their capacity to leverage internal knowledge about specific entities remains underexplored. This work investigates the disparity in model performance when answering factual questions about an entity described in text versus depicted in an image. Our results reveal a significant accuracy drop -reaching 18% for some models -when the entity is presented visually instead of textually. To study this gap we present POPVQA, a dataset which allows separating entity recognition and question answering, and use it to benchmark several models. We hypothesize that this decline arises from limitations in how information flows from image tokens to query tokens. Thus, we use mechanistic interpretability tools to reveal that, although image tokens are preprocessed by the vision encoder, meaningful information flow from these tokens occurs only in the much deeper layers. Furthermore, critical image processing happens in the language model's middle layers, allowing few layers for consecutive reasoning, highlighting a potential inefficiency in how the model utilizes its layers for reasoning. These insights shed light on the internal mechanics of VLMs and offer pathways for enhancing their reasoning capabilities. POPVQA can be found at this link.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Same Task, Different Circuits: Disentangling Modality-Specific Mechanisms in VLMsYaniv Nikankin, Dana Arad, Yossi Gandelsman, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2025 · 37 citations
- Map the Flow: Revealing Hidden Pathways of Information in VideoLLMsMinji Kim, Taekyung Kim, Bohyung HanICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Too Late to Recall: Explaining the Two-Hop Problem in Multimodal Knowledge RetrievalConstantin Venhoff, Ashkan Khakzar, Sonia Joseph, Philip H. S. Torr et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on17
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation AnalysisJesse Vig, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Sharon Qian et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 851 citations
- Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder TransformersHila Chefer, Shir Gur, Lior WolfICCV 2021 · 451 citations
- When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric MemoriesAlex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das et al.ACL 2023 · 233 citations
Related papers
- Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language ModelsClement Neo, Luke Ong, Philip Torr, Mor Geva et al.ICLR 2025
- Cross-Lingual Text-Rich Visual Comprehension: An Information Theory PerspectiveXinmiao Yu, Xiaocheng Feng, Yun Li, Minghui Liao et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Towards Reasoning Ability in Scene Text Visual Question AnsweringQingqing Wang, Liqiang Xiao, Yue Lu, Yaohui Jin et al.ACM MM 2021 · 12 citations
- What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language ModelsOmri Kaduri, Shai Bagon, Tali DekelCVPR 2025
- Do Vision-Language Transformers Exhibit Visual Commonsense? An Empirical Study of VCRZhenyang Li, Yangyang Guo, Kejie Wang, Xiaolin Chen et al.ACM MM 2023 · 11 citations
