Formalizing Data Deletion in the Context of the Right to Be Forgotten
Sanjam Garg, Shafi Goldwasser, Prashant Nalini Vasudevan
Abstract
The right of an individual to request the deletion of their personal data by an entity that might be storing it -referred to as the right to be forgotten -has been explicitly recognized, legislated, and exercised in several jurisdictions across the world, including the European Union, Argentina, and California. However, much of the discussion surrounding this right offers only an intuitive notion of what it means for it to be fulfilled -of what it means for such personal data to be deleted.
In this work, we provide a formal definitional framework for the right to be forgotten using tools and paradigms from cryptography. In particular, we provide a precise definition of what could be (or should be) expected from an entity that collects individuals' data when a request is made of it to delete some of this data. Our framework captures several, though not all, relevant aspects of typical systems involved in data processing. While it cannot be viewed as expressing the statements of current laws (especially since these are rather vague in this respect), our work offers technically precise definitions that represent possibilities for what the law could reasonably expect, and alternatives for what future versions of the law could explicitly require.
Finally, with the goal of demonstrating the applicability of our framework and definitions, we consider various natural and simple scenarios where the right to be forgotten comes up. For each of these scenarios, we highlight the pitfalls that arise even in genuine attempts at implementing systems offering deletion guarantees, and also describe technological solutions that provably satisfy our definitions. These solutions bring together techniques built by various communities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2eed4140-6bc2-4469-994f-80e6fac64389Cited by top-tier papers26
- Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine UnlearningAyush Sekhari, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath, Ananda Theertha SureshNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- Machine Unlearning for Random ForestsJonathan Brophy, Daniel LowdICML 2021 · 222 citations
- Fast Federated Machine Unlearning with Nonlinear Functional TheoryTianshi Che, Yang Zhou, Zijie Zhang, Lingjuan Lyu et al.ICML 2023 · 77 citations
- Understanding Account Deletion and Relevant Dark Patterns on Social MediaBrennan Schaffner, Neha A. Lingareddy, Marshini ChettyCSCW 2022 · 66 citations
- Prompt Certified Machine Unlearning with Randomized Gradient Smoothing and QuantizationZijie Zhang, Yang Zhou, Xin Zhao, Tianshi Che et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 56 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Towards Bridging the Gaps between the Right to Explanation and the Right to be ForgottenSatyapriya Krishna, Jiaqi Ma, Himabindu LakkarajuICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Control, Confidentiality, and the Right to be ForgottenAloni Cohen, Adam D. Smith, Marika Swanberg, Prashant Nalini VasudevanCCS 2023 · 6 citations
- On the Trade-Off between Actionable Explanations and the Right to be ForgottenMartin Pawelczyk, Tobias Leemann, Asia Biega, Gjergji KasneciICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- A Stakeholder-Based Framework to Highlight Tensions when Implementing Privacy FeaturesJulia Netter, Tim Nelson, Skyler Austen, Eva Lau et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Amnesiac Machine LearningLaura Graves, Vineel Nagisetty, Vijay GaneshAAAI 2021 · 416 citations
