What Lies Beneath? Exploring the Impact of Underlying AI Model Updates in AI-Infused Systems
Vikram Mohanty, Jude Lim, Kurt Luther
Abstract
AI models are constantly evolving, with new versions released frequently. Human-AI interaction guidelines encourage notifying users about changes in model capabilities, ideally supported by thorough benchmarking. However, as AI systems integrate into domain-specific workflows, exhaustive benchmarking can become impractical, often resulting in silent or minimally communicated updates. This raises critical questions: Can users notice these updates? What cues do they rely on to distinguish between models? How do such changes affect their behavior and task performance? We address these questions through two studies in the context of facial recognition for historical photo identification: an online experiment examining users' ability to detect model updates, followed by a diary study exploring perceptions in a real-world deployment. Our findings highlight challenges in noticing AI model updates, their impact on downstream user behavior and performance, and how they lead users to develop divergent folk theories. Drawing on these insights, we discuss strategies for effectively communicating model updates in AI-infused systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2edca691-d9c4-451f-aafa-15192990c145Cited by top-tier papers3
- Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot InteractionBhada Yun, Evgenia Taranova, April Yi WangCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Power Echoes: Investigating Moderation Biases in Online Power-Asymmetric ConflictsYaqiong Li, Peng Zhang, Peixu Hou, Kainan Tu et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- AI as We Describe It: How Large Language Models and Their Applications in Health are Represented Across Channels of Public DiscourseJiawei Zhou, Lei Zhang, Mei Li, Benjamin D. Horne et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-MakingHelena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg et al.CSCW 2023 · 362 citations
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic ResistanceNadia Karizat, Daniel Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2021 · 338 citations
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
Related papers
- Watch Out for Updates: Understanding the Effects of Model Explanation Updates in AI-Assisted Decision MakingXinru Wang, Ming YinCHI 2023 · 34 citations
- Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI BehaviorÁngel Alexander Cabrera, Adam Perer, Jason I. HongCSCW 2023 · 85 citations
- Mind Your Manners: The Dynamics of Politeness in Human-AI vs. Human-Human InteractionsTeddy Lazebnik, Lior Zalmanson, Osnat MokrynCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Evaluating What Others Say: The Effect of Accuracy Assessment in Shaping Mental Models of AI SystemsHyo Jin Do, Michelle Brachman, Casey Dugan, Qian Pan et al.CSCW 2024 · 4 citations
- Dialogues with AI Reduce Beliefs in Misinformation but Build No Lasting Discernment SkillsAnku Rani, Valdemar Danry, Paul Pu Liang, Andrew Lippman et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
