Neural-Symbolic Inference for Robust Autoregressive Graph Parsing via Compositional Uncertainty Quantification
Zi Lin, Jeremiah Z. Liu, Jingbo Shang
Abstract
Pre-trained seq2seq models excel at graph semantic parsing with rich annotated data, but generalize worse to out-of-distribution (OOD) and long-tail examples. In comparison, symbolic parsers under-perform on populationlevel metrics, but exhibit unique strength in OOD and tail generalization. In this work, we study compositionality-aware approach to neural-symbolic inference informed by model confidence, performing fine-grained neuralsymbolic reasoning at subgraph level (i.e., nodes and edges) and precisely targeting subgraph components with high uncertainty in the neural parser. As a result, the method combines the distinct strength of the neural and symbolic approaches in capturing different aspects of the graph prediction, leading to well-rounded generalization performance both across domains and in the tail. We empirically investigate the approach in the English Resource Grammar (ERG) parsing problem on a diverse suite of standard in-domain and seven OOD corpora. Our approach leads to 35.26% and 35.60% error reduction in aggregated SMATCH score over neural and symbolic approaches respectively, and 14% absolute accuracy gain in key tail linguistic categories over the neural model, outperforming prior state-of-art methods that do not account for compositionality or uncertainty. _the_q <0> _want_v_1 <2> _boy_n_1 <1> _believe_v_1 <6> _girl_n_1 <0> pron <7> pronoun_q _the_q <3> BV BV BV ARG1 ARG2 ARG1 ARG2 The <0> boy <1> wants <2> the <3> girl <4> to <5> believe <6> him <7> Abstract Concepts (grammatical function) Root Token-Node Alignments Surface Concepts (related to surface tokens) <•> (a) EDS Representation ( _want_v_1 :ARG1 ( _boy_n_1 :BV-of ( _the_q ) ) :AGR2 ( _believe_v_1 :ARG1 ( _girl_n_1 :BV-of ( _the_q ) ) :ARG2 ( pron :BV-of ( pronoun_q ) ) ) )
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance AwarenessJeremiah Z. Liu, Zi Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Dustin Tran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 604 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation in Autoregressive Structured PredictionAndrey Malinin, Mark J. F. GalesICLR 2021 · 439 citations
- Sequence-to-Sequence Learning with Latent Neural GrammarsYoon KimNeurIPS 2021 · 44 citations
- Ensembling Graph Predictions for AMR ParsingThanh Lam Hoang, Gabriele Picco, Yufang Hou, Young-Suk Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 29 citations
- Evaluating Distributional Distortion in Neural Language ModelingBenjamin LeBrun, Alessandro Sordoni, Timothy J. O'DonnellICLR 2022 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Structural generalization is hard for sequence-to-sequence modelsYuekun Yao, Alexander KollerEMNLP 2022 · 8 citations
- On Compositional Uncertainty Quantification for Seq2seq Graph ParsingZi Lin, Du Phan, Panupong Pasupat, Jeremiah Zhe Liu et al.ICLR 2023
- Systematic Generalization with Edge TransformersLeon Bergen, Timothy J. O'Donnell, Dzmitry BahdanauNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
- NeuSymEA: Neuro-symbolic Entity Alignment via Variational InferenceShengyuan Chen, Zheng Yuan, Qinggang Zhang, Wen Hua et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Structural generalization in COGS: Supertagging is (almost) all you needAlban Petit, Caio F. Corro, François YvonEMNLP 2023
