ACL Findings2022
Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Language
Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, Yejin Choi, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Abstract
What kinds of instructional prompts are easier to follow for Language Models (LMs)? We study this question by conducting extensive empirical analysis that shed light on important features of successful instructional prompts. Specifically, we study several classes of reframing techniques for manual reformulation of prompts into more effective ones. Some examples include decomposing a complex task instruction into multiple simpler tasks or itemizing instructions into sequential steps. Our experiments compare the zero-shot and fewshot performance of LMs prompted with reframed instructions on 12 NLP tasks across 6 categories. Compared with original instructions, our reframed instructions lead to significant improvements across LMs with different sizes. For example, the same reframed prompts boost few-shot performance of GPT3series and GPT2-series by 12.5% and 6.7% respectively averaged over all tasks. Furthermore, reframed instructions reduce the number of examples required to prompt LMs in the few-shot setting. We hope these empiricallydriven techniques will pave the way towards more effective future prompting algorithms.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 47 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers47
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function ClassesShivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy Liang, Gregory ValiantNeurIPS 2022 · 883 citations
- Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractorsMonica Agrawal, Stefan Hegselmann, Hunter Lang, Yoon Kim et al.EMNLP 2022 · 285 citations
- Connecting Large Language Models with Evolutionary Algorithms Yields Powerful Prompt OptimizersQingyan Guo, Rui Wang, Junliang Guo, Bei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 257 citations
- Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language ModelsHuaixiu Steven Zheng, Swaroop Mishra, Xinyun Chen, Heng-Tze Cheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 216 citations
Builds on9
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating the Zero-shot Robustness of Instruction-tuned Language ModelsJiuding Sun, Chantal Shaib, Byron C. WallaceICLR 2024 · 75 citations
- Split and Rephrase with Large Language ModelsDavid Ponce, Thierry Etchegoyhen, Jesus Calleja, Harritxu GeteACL 2024
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Cutting Down on Prompts and Parameters: Simple Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsRobert L. Logan IV, Ivana Balazevic, Eric Wallace, Fabio Petroni et al.ACL Findings 2022 · 133 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
