Estimating Agreement by Chance for Sequence Annotation
Diya Li, Carolyn P. Rosé, Ao Yuan, Chunxiao Zhou
Abstract
In the field of natural language processing, correction of performance assessment for chance agreement plays a crucial role in evaluating the reliability of annotations. However, there is a notable dearth of research focusing on chance correction for assessing the reliability of sequence annotation tasks, despite their widespread prevalence in the field. To address this gap, this paper introduces a novel model for generating random annotations, which serves as the foundation for estimating chance agreement in sequence annotation tasks. Utilizing the proposed randomization model and a related comparison approach, we successfully derive the analytical form of the distribution, enabling the computation of the probable location of each annotated text segment and subsequent chance agreement estimation. Through a combination simulation and corpus-based evaluation, we successfully assess its applicability and validate its accuracy and efficacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Related papers
- Evaluating Sequence Labeling on the basis of Information TheoryEnrique Amigó, Elena Álvarez Mellado, Julio Gonzalo, Jorge Carrillo-de-AlbornozACL 2025
- Overcoming Copyright Barriers in Corpus Distribution Through Non-Reversible HashingArthur Amalvy, Vincent Labatut, Xavier Bost, Hen-Hsen HuangACL 2026
- Near-Negative Distinction: Giving a Second Life to Human Evaluation DatasetsPhilippe Laban, Chien-Sheng Wu, Wenhao Liu, Caiming XiongEMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- We Need to Talk About Reproducibility in NLP Model ComparisonYan Xue, Xuefei Cao, Xingli Yang, Yu Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Evaluating Evaluation Metrics: A Framework for Analyzing NLG Evaluation Metrics using Measurement TheoryZiang Xiao, Susu Zhang, Vivian Lai, Q. Vera LiaoEMNLP 2023 · 6 citations
