TRACT: Regression-Aware Fine-tuning Meets Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for LLM-as-a-Judge
Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi Lee, Michal Lukasik
Abstract
The LLM-as-a-judge paradigm uses large language models (LLMs) for automated text evaluation, where a numerical assessment is assigned by an LLM to the input text following scoring rubrics. Existing methods for LLM-as-a-judge use cross-entropy (CE) loss for fine-tuning, which neglects the numeric nature of score prediction. Recent work addresses numerical prediction limitations of LLM fine-tuning through regression-aware fine-tuning, which, however, does not consider chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning for score prediction. In this paper, we introduce TRACT (Two-stage Regression-Aware fine-tuning with CoT), a method combining CoT reasoning with regression-aware training. TRACT consists of two stages: first, seed LLM is fine-tuned to generate CoTs, which serve as supervision for the second stage fine-tuning. The training objective of TRACT combines the CE loss for learning the CoT reasoning capabilities, and the regression-aware loss for the score prediction. Experiments across four LLM-as-a-judge datasets and two LLMs show that TRACT significantly outperforms existing methods. Extensive ablation studies validate the importance of each component in TRACT. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2de0e034-bf81-488e-80db-a97252fd8151Cited by top-tier papers6
- From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi et al.EMNLP 2025 · 37 citations
- Beyond Token-level Supervision: Unlocking the Potential of Decoding-based Regression via Reinforcement LearningMing Chen, Sheng Tang, Rong-Xi Tan, Ziniu Li et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- REAL: Regression-Aware Reinforcement Learning for LLM-as-a-JudgeYasi Zhang, Tianyu Chen, Mingyuan Zhou, Oscar Leong et al.ICML 2026
- SPR-RAFT: Parameter-Efficient Regression-Aware Fine-Tuning for Biomedical LLM RegressionYuanlin Yang, Chenhui Li, Xuhao Guo, ANQI ZHANG et al.ICML 2026
- Diagnosing the Reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge via Item Response TheoryJunhyuk Choi, Sohhyung Park, chanhee cho, Hyeonchu Park et al.ICML 2026
Builds on23
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
Related papers
- Beyond the Surface: Enhancing LLM-as-a-Judge Alignment with Human via Internal RepresentationsPeng Lai, Jianjie Zheng, Sijie Cheng, Yun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Praetor: A Fine-Grained Generative LLM Evaluator with Instance-Level Customizable Evaluation CriteriaYongqi Leng, Renren Jin, Yue Chen, Zhuowen Han et al.ACL 2025
- Incentivizing Agentic Reasoning in LLM Judges via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement LearningRan Xu, Jingjing Chen, Jiayu Ye, Yu Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate ThemYidong Wang, Yunze Song, Tingyuan Zhu, Xuanwang Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 29 citations
- Think-J: Learning to Think for Generative LLM-as-a-JudgeHui Huang, Yancheng He, Hongli Zhou, Rui Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 12 citations
