Candidate Soups: Fusing Candidate Results Improves Translation Quality for Non-Autoregressive Translation
Huanran Zheng, Wei Zhu, Pengfei Wang, Xiaoling Wang
Abstract
Non-autoregressive translation (NAT) model achieves a much faster inference speed than the autoregressive translation (AT) model because it can simultaneously predict all tokens during inference. However, its translation quality suffers from degradation compared to AT. And existing NAT methods only focus on improving the NAT model's performance but do not fully utilize it. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective method called "Candidate Soups," which can obtain high-quality translations while maintaining the inference speed of NAT models. Unlike previous approaches that pick the individual result and discard the remainders, Candidate Soups (CDS) can fully use the valuable information in the different candidate translations through model uncertainty. Extensive experiments on two benchmarks (WMT'14 EN–DE and WMT'16 EN–RO) demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our proposed method, which can significantly improve the translation quality of various base models. More notably, our best variant outperforms the AT model on three translation tasks with 7.6× speedup.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2d8b3b8b-1c1e-487e-97d4-9a50b30b60ecBuilds on11
- Latent-Variable Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Deterministic Inference Using a Delta PosteriorRaphael Shu, Jason Lee, Hideki Nakayama, Kyunghyun ChoAAAI 2020 · 125 citations
- Aligned Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine TranslationMarjan Ghazvininejad, Vladimir Karpukhin, Luke Zettlemoyer, Omer LevyICML 2020 · 121 citations
- Non-autoregressive Machine Translation with Disentangled Context TransformerJungo Kasai, James Cross, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Jiatao GuICML 2020 · 113 citations
- Order-Agnostic Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine TranslationCunxiao Du, Zhaopeng Tu, Jing JiangICML 2021 · 93 citations
- Guiding Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation Decoding with Reordering InformationQiu Ran, Yankai Lin, Peng Li, Jie ZhouAAAI 2021 · 82 citations
Related papers
- NAT4AT: Using Non-Autoregressive Translation Makes Autoregressive Translation Faster and BetterHuanran Zheng, Wei Zhu, Xiaoling WangWWW 2024 · 13 citations
- Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine TranslationChunting Zhou, Jiatao Gu, Graham NeubigICLR 2020 · 235 citations
- RenewNAT: Renewing Potential Translation for Non-autoregressive TransformerPei Guo, Yisheng Xiao, Juntao Li, Min ZhangAAAI 2023 · 9 citations
- Fine-Tuning by Curriculum Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine TranslationJunliang Guo, Xu Tan, Linli Xu, Tao Qin et al.AAAI 2020 · 91 citations
- Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine TranslationJungo Kasai, Nikolaos Pappas, Hao Peng, James Cross et al.ICLR 2021 · 154 citations
