Fine-Tuning by Curriculum Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation
Junliang Guo, Xu Tan, Linli Xu, Tao Qin, Enhong Chen, Tie-Yan Liu
Abstract
Non-autoregressive translation (NAT) models remove the dependence on previous target tokens and generate all target tokens in parallel, resulting in significant inference speedup but at the cost of inferior translation accuracy compared to autoregressive translation (AT) models. Considering that AT models have higher accuracy and are easier to train than NAT models, and both of them share the same model configurations, a natural idea to improve the accuracy of NAT models is to transfer a well-trained AT model to an NAT model through fine-tuning. However, since AT and NAT models differ greatly in training strategy, straightforward fine-tuning does not work well. In this work, we introduce curriculum learning into fine-tuning for NAT. Specifically, we design a curriculum in the fine-tuning process to progressively switch the training from autoregressive generation to non-autoregressive generation. Experiments on four benchmark translation datasets show that the proposed method achieves good improvement (more than 1 BLEU score) over previous NAT baselines in terms of translation accuracy, and greatly speed up (more than 10 times) the inference process over AT baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e1d1cb2-8227-473d-8a8b-19cd747eedb4Cited by top-tier papers26
- Diffusion Language Models Are Versatile Protein LearnersXinyou Wang, Zaixiang Zheng, Fei Ye, Dongyu Xue et al.ICML 2024 · 113 citations
- FastCorrect: Fast Error Correction with Edit Alignment for Automatic Speech RecognitionYichong Leng, Xu Tan, Linchen Zhu, Jin Xu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 84 citations
- Guiding Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation Decoding with Reordering InformationQiu Ran, Yankai Lin, Peng Li, Jie ZhouAAAI 2021 · 82 citations
- Incorporating BERT into Parallel Sequence Decoding with AdaptersJunliang Guo, Zhirui Zhang, Linli Xu, Hao-Ran Wei et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 72 citations
- A Study of Non-autoregressive Model for Sequence GenerationYi Ren, Jinglin Liu, Xu Tan, Zhou Zhao et al.ACL 2020 · 58 citations
Related papers
- NAT4AT: Using Non-Autoregressive Translation Makes Autoregressive Translation Faster and BetterHuanran Zheng, Wei Zhu, Xiaoling WangWWW 2024 · 13 citations
- Curriculum Learning for Biological Sequence Prediction: The Case of De Novo Peptide SequencingXiang Zhang, Jiaqi Wei, Zijie Qiu, Sheng Xu et al.ICML 2025
- Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine TranslationChunting Zhou, Jiatao Gu, Graham NeubigICLR 2020 · 235 citations
- Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine TranslationJungo Kasai, Nikolaos Pappas, Hao Peng, James Cross et al.ICLR 2021 · 154 citations
- Learning to Rewrite for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine TranslationXinwei Geng, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing QinEMNLP 2021 · 30 citations
