ChatBench: From Static Benchmarks to Human-AI Evaluation
Serina Chang, Ashton Anderson, Jake M. Hofman
Abstract
With the rapid adoption of LLM-based chatbots, there is a pressing need to evaluate what humans and LLMs can achieve together. However, standard benchmarks, such as MMLU, measure LLM capabilities in isolation (i.e., "AIalone"). Here, we design and conduct a user study to convert MMLU questions into user-AI conversations, by seeding the user with the question and having them carry out a conversation with the LLM to answer their question. We release ChatBench, a new dataset with AIalone, user-alone, and user-AI data for 396 questions and two LLMs, including 144K answers and 7,336 user-AI conversations. We find that AI-alone accuracy fails to predict user-AI accuracy, with significant differences across multiple subjects (math, physics, and moral reasoning), and we analyze the user-AI conversations to provide insight into how they diverge from AI-alone benchmarks. Finally, we show that fine-tuning a user simulator on a subset of ChatBench improves its ability to estimate user-AI accuracies, increasing correlation on heldout questions by more than 20 points, creating possibilities for scaling interactive evaluation. 1 A number is rounded to the nearest hundred. The result is 500. Which number could not be the number before it was rounded to the nearest hundred? A. 458 B. 463 C. 547 D. 559 Elementary Mathematics To say that a rose petal is red is to say that it A. absorbs red B. reflects red C. emits red D. transmits red Conceptual Physics For which of these two scenarios does the main character do something clearly morally wrong? Scenario 1 | I embraced my sister's newly widowed husband to show him sympathy. Scenario 2 | I came home late one night to find that I had lost my house keys, so I had to break into my neighbor's house. A
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic EvaluationsPreethi Seshadri, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Ayomide Odumakinde, Sameer Singh et al.ACL 2026 · 19 citations
- User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning SignalYuhan Liu, Michael J. Q. Zhang, Eunsol ChoiEMNLP 2025 · 12 citations
- Mitigating Lost in Multi-turn Conversation via Curriculum RL with Verifiable Accuracy and Abstention RewardsMing Li, Pei Chen, Zhenhao Zhang, Tao Yang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- ReIn: Conversational Error Recovery with Reasoning InceptionTakyoung Kim, Jinseok Nam, Chandrayee Basu, Xing Fan et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on14
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
Related papers
- SimBench: Benchmarking the Ability of Large Language Models to Simulate Human BehaviorsTiancheng Hu, Joachim Baumann, Lorenzo Lupo, Nigel Collier et al.ICLR 2026 · 61 citations
- MotiveBench: How Far Are We From Human-Like Motivational Reasoning in Large Language Models?Xixian Yong, Jianxun Lian, Xiaoyuan Yi, Xiao Zhou et al.ACL Findings 2025
- Aligning AI With Shared Human ValuesDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch et al.ICLR 2021 · 878 citations
- A User-Centric Multi-Intent Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language ModelsJiayin Wang, Fengran Mo, Weizhi Ma, Peijie Sun et al.EMNLP 2024 · 10 citations
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
