Q-Adapter: Customizing Pre-trained LLMs to New Preferences with Forgetting Mitigation
Yi-Chen Li, Fuxiang Zhang, Wenjie Qiu, Lei Yuan, Chengxing Jia, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu, Bo An
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), trained on a large amount of corpus, have demonstrated remarkable abilities. However, it may not be sufficient to directly apply open-source LLMs like Llama to certain real-world scenarios, since most of them are trained for general purposes. Thus, the demands for customizing publicly available LLMs emerge, but are currently under-studied. In this work, we consider customizing pre-trained LLMs with new human preferences. Specifically, the LLM should not only meet the new preference but also preserve its original capabilities after customization. Drawing inspiration from the observation that human preference can be expressed as a reward model, we propose to cast LLM customization as optimizing the sum of two reward functions, one of which (denoted as ) was used to pre-train the LLM while the other (denoted as ) characterizes the new human preference. The obstacle here is that both reward functions are unknown, making the application of modern reinforcement learning methods infeasible. Thanks to the residual Q-learning framework, we can restore the customized LLM with the pre-trained LLM and the residual Q-function without the reward function . Moreover, we find that for a fixed pre-trained LLM, the reward function can be derived from the residual Q-function, enabling us to directly learn the residual Q-function from the new human preference data upon the Bradley-Terry model. We name our method Q-Adapter as it introduces an adapter module to approximate the residual Q-function for customizing the pre-trained LLM towards the new preference. Experiments based on the Llama-3.1 model on the DSP dataset and HH-RLHF dataset illustrate the superior effectiveness of Q-Adapter on both retaining existing knowledge and learning new preferences. Code is available at https://github.com/mansicer/Q-Adapter.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language ModelsZiniu Li, Congliang Chen, Tian Xu, Zeyu Qin et al.ICLR 2025
- REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward DecompositionFuxiang Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Chenran Li, Yi-Chen Li et al.ICML 2026
Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Aligning AI With Shared Human ValuesDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch et al.ICLR 2021 · 878 citations
Related papers
- Direct Multi-Turn Preference Optimization for Language AgentsWentao Shi, Mengqi Yuan, Junkang Wu, Qifan Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Learning to summarize user information for personalized reinforcement learning from human feedbackHyunJi Nam, Yanming Wan, Mickel Liu, Peter F. Ahnn et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- MiCRo: Mixture Modeling and Context-aware Routing for Personalized Preference LearningJingyan Shen, Jiarui Yao, Rui Yang, Yifan Sun et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
