DEFAME: Dynamic Evidence-based FAct-checking with Multimodal Experts
Tobias Braun, Mark Rothermel, Marcus Rohrbach, Anna Rohrbach
Abstract
The proliferation of disinformation demands reliable and scalable fact-checking solutions. We present Dynamic Evidence-based FAct-checking with Multimodal Experts (DEFAME), a modular, zero-shot MLLM pipeline for open-domain, text-image claim verification. DEFAME operates in a six-stage process, dynamically selecting the tools and search depth to extract and evaluate textual and visual evidence. Unlike prior approaches that are text-only, lack explainability, or rely solely on parametric knowledge, DEFAME performs end-to-end verification, accounting for images in claims and evidence while generating structured, multimodal reports. Evaluation on the popular benchmarks VERITE, AVERITEC, and MOCHEG shows that DEFAME surpasses all previous methods, establishing itself as the new general state-of-the-art fact-checking system for uni-and multimodal fact-checking. Moreover, we introduce a new multimodal benchmark, CLAIM-REVIEW2024+, featuring claims after the knowledge cutoff of GPT-4O, avoiding data leakage. Here, DEFAME drastically outperforms the GPT-4O baselines, showing temporal generalizability and the potential for real-time fact-checking 2 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b801efe-385e-45ee-99a1-6708f3adb2e0Cited by top-tier papers10
- Fact-R1: Towards Explainable Video Misinformation Detection with Deep ReasoningFanrui Zhang, Dian Li, Qiang Zhang, Jun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Seeing Through Deception: Uncovering Misleading Creator Intent in Multimodal News with Vision-Language ModelsJiaying Wu, Fanxiao Li, Zihang Fu, Min-Yen Kan et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- VeriTaS: The First Dynamic Benchmark for Multimodal Automated Fact-CheckingMark Rothermel, Marcus Kornmann, Marcus Rohrbach, Anna RohrbachACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Drifting Away from Truth: GenAI-Driven News Diversity Challenges LVLM-Based Misinformation DetectionFanxiao Li, Jiaying Wu, Tingchao Fu, Yunyun Dong et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- VisRet: Visualization Improves Knowledge-Intensive Text-to-Image RetrievalDi Wu, Yixin Wan, Kai-Wei ChangACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on16
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for ReasoningDídac Surís, Sachit Menon, Carl VondrickICCV 2023 · 732 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with LanguageAndy Zeng, Maria Attarian, Brian Ichter, Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski et al.ICLR 2023 · 171 citations
- Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot AnymoreChangmao Li, Jeffrey FlaniganAAAI 2024 · 138 citations
Related papers
- BiDeV: Bilateral Defusing Verification for Complex Claim Fact-CheckingYuxuan Liu, Hongda Sun, Wenya Guo, Xinyan Xiao et al.AAAI 2025 · 11 citations
- Zero-Shot Multimodal Fact-Checking with Conceptual ReasoningGuoyi Li, Die Hu, Haozhe Li, Qirui Tang et al.ACM MM 2025
- LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News DetectionCheng Xu, Changhong Jin, Yingjie Niu, Nan Yan et al.ACL 2026
- A Fact-Checking Framework with Denoising Evidence Retrieval and LLM-Based Debate VerificationJun Yang, Yuhan Bai, Dandan Song, Zhijing Wu et al.WWW 2026
- FakeWorld 1.0: An Omni-modal Benchmark for Fake Media and ContentYifeng Gao, Yifan Ding, Li Wang, Feida Huang et al.ICML 2026
