Second-Order Uncertainty Quantification: A Distance-Based Approach
Yusuf Sale, Viktor Bengs, Michele Caprio, Eyke Hüllermeier
Abstract
In the past couple of years, various approaches to representing and quantifying different types of predictive uncertainty in machine learning, notably in the setting of classification, have been proposed on the basis of second-order probability distributions, i.e., predictions in the form of distributions on probability distributions. A completely conclusive solution has not yet been found, however, as shown by recent criticisms of commonly used uncertainty measures associated with second-order distributions, identifying undesirable theoretical properties of these measures. In light of these criticisms, we propose a set of formal criteria that meaningful uncertainty measures for predictive uncertainty based on second-order distributions should obey. Moreover, we provide a general framework for developing uncertainty measures to account for these criteria, and offer an instantiation based on the Wasserstein distance, for which we prove that all criteria are satisfied.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b2120ef-8c05-435f-bf4f-f6eb331d6e4fCited by top-tier papers10
- Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?Mira Jürgens, Nis Meinert, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier et al.ICML 2024 · 35 citations
- Credal Learning TheoryMichele Caprio, Maryam Sultana, Eleni Elia, Fabio CuzzolinNeurIPS 2024 · 34 citations
- Experts Don't Cheat: Learning What You Don't Know By Predicting PairsDaniel D. Johnson, Daniel Tarlow, David Duvenaud, Chris J. MaddisonICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Integral Imprecise Probability MetricsSiu Lun Chau, Michele Caprio, Krikamol MuandetNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Probabilistic Self-supervised Representation Learning via Scoring Rules MinimizationAmirhossein Vahidi, Simon Schoßer, Lisa Wimmer, Yawei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 6 citations
Builds on5
- Deep Evidential RegressionAlexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2020 · 777 citations
- Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss MinimisationViktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier, Willem WaegemanNeurIPS 2022 · 78 citations
- On Uncertainty, Tempering, and Data Augmentation in Bayesian ClassificationSanyam Kapoor, Wesley J. Maddox, Pavel Izmailov, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2022 · 64 citations
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential RegressionNis Meinert, Jakob Gawlikowski, Alexander LavinAAAI 2023 · 58 citations
- On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty QuantificationViktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier, Willem WaegemanICML 2023 · 37 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning: One Size Does Not Fit AllPaul Hofman, Yusuf Sale, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic UncertaintyFreddie Bickford Smith, Jannik Kossen, Eleanor Trollope, Mark van der Wilk et al.ICML 2025
- Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Single Deterministic Neural NetworkNikita Kotelevskii, Aleksandr Artemenkov, Kirill Fedyanin, Fedor Noskov et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
- Wasserstein Gradient Boosting: A Framework for Distribution-Valued Supervised LearningTakuo MatsubaraNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Quantile Risk Control: A Flexible Framework for Bounding the Probability of High-Loss PredictionsJake Snell, Thomas P. Zollo, Zhun Deng, Toniann Pitassi et al.ICLR 2023 · 1 citation
