QuantumHammer: A Practical Hybrid Attack on the LUOV Signature Scheme
Koksal Mus, Saad Islam, Berk Sunar
Abstract
Post-quantum schemes are expected to replace existing public-key schemes within a decade in billions of devices. To facilitate the transition, the US National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) is running a standardization process. Multivariate signatures is one of the main categories in NIST's post-quantum cryptography competition. Among the four candidates in this category, the LUOV and Rainbow schemes are based on the Oil and Vinegar scheme, first introduced in 1997 which has withstood over two decades of cryptanalysis. Beyond mathematical security and efficiency, security against side-channel attacks is a major concern in the competition. The current sentiment is that post-quantum schemes may be more resistant to fault-injection attacks due to their large key sizes and the lack of algebraic structure. We show that this is not true. We introduce a novel hybrid attack, QuantumHammer, and demonstrate it on the constant-time implementation of LUOV currently in Round 2 of the NIST post-quantum competition. The QuantumHammer attack is a combination of two attacks, a bit-tracing attack enabled via Rowhammer fault injection and a divide and conquer attack that uses bit-tracing as an oracle. Using bit-tracing, an attacker with access to faulty signatures collected using Rowhammer attack, can recover secret key bits albeit slowly. We employ a divide and conquer attack which exploits the structure in the key generation part of LUOV and solves the system of equations for the secret key more efficiently with few key bits recovered via bit-tracing. We have demonstrated the first successful in-the-wild attack on LUOV recovering all 11K key bits with less than 4 hours of an active Rowhammer attack. The post-processing part is highly parallel and thus can be trivially sped up using modest resources. QuantumHammer does not make any unrealistic assumptions, only requires software co-location (no physical access), and therefore can be used to target shared cloud servers or in other sandboxed environments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2a39f10c-9f2a-4478-a00f-de3023f4432fCited by top-tier papers5
- When Frodo Flips: End-to-End Key Recovery on FrodoKEM via RowhammerMichael Fahr, Hunter Kippen, Andrew Kwong, Thinh Dang et al.CCS 2022 · 34 citations
- SledgeHammer: Amplifying Rowhammer via Bank-level ParallelismIngab Kang, Walter Wang, Jason Kim, Stephan van Schaik et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 28 citations
- Jolt: Recovering TLS Signing Keys via Rowhammer FaultsKoksal Mus, Yarkin Doröz, M. Caner Tol, Kristi Rahman et al.S&P 2023
- ZK-Hammer: Leaking Secrets from Zero-Knowledge Proofs via RowhammerJunkai Liang, Xin Zhang, Daqi Hu, Qingni Shen et al.DAC 2025
- Achilles: A Formal Framework of Leaking Secrets from Signature Schemes via RowhammerJunkai Liang, Zhi Zhang, Xin Zhang, Qingni Shen et al.USENIX Security 2025
Builds on11
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss et al.CCS 2016 · 381 citations
- Another Flip in the Wall of Rowhammer DefensesDaniel Gruss, Moritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2018 · 288 citations
- TRRespass: Exploiting the Many Sides of Target Row RefreshPietro Frigo, Emanuele Vannacci, Hasan Hassan, Victor van der Veen et al.S&P 2020 · 274 citations
- One Bit Flips, One Cloud Flops: Cross-VM Row Hammer Attacks and Privilege EscalationYuan Xiao, Xiaokuan Zhang, Yinqian Zhang, Radu TeodorescuUSENIX Security 2016 · 272 citations
- RAMBleed: Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing ThemAndrew Kwong, Daniel Genkin, Daniel Gruss, Yuval YaromS&P 2020 · 239 citations
Related papers
- Cryptanalysis of the Lifted Unbalanced Oil Vinegar Signature SchemeJintai Ding, Joshua Deaton, Kurt Schmidt, Vishakha et al.CRYPTO 2020 · 15 citations
- Improved Cryptanalysis of UOV and RainbowWard BeullensEUROCRYPT 2021 · 96 citations
- PQ-Hammer: End-to-End Key Recovery Attacks on Post-Quantum Cryptography Using RowhammerSamy Amer, Yingchen Wang, Hunter Kippen, Thinh Dang et al.S&P 2025
- Breaking Rainbow Takes a Weekend on a LaptopWard BeullensCRYPTO 2022 · 170 citations
- mUOV: Masking the Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar Digital Signature Scheme at First- and Higher-OrderSuparna Kundu, Quinten Norga, Angshuman Karmakar, Uttam Kumar Ojha et al.CCS 2025
