PEER: A Collaborative Language Model
Timo Schick, Jane A. Yu, Zhengbao Jiang, Fabio Petroni, Patrick Lewis, Gautier Izacard, Qingfei You, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Edouard Grave, Sebastian Riedel
Abstract
Textual content is often the output of a collaborative writing process: We start with an initial draft, ask for suggestions, and repeatedly make changes. Agnostic of this process, today's language models are trained to generate only the final result. As a consequence, they lack several abilities crucial for collaborative writing: They are unable to update existing texts, difficult to control and incapable of verbally planning or explaining their actions. To address these shortcomings, we introduce PEER, a collaborative language model that is trained to imitate the entire writing process itself: PEER can write drafts, add suggestions, propose edits and provide explanations for its actions. Crucially, we train multiple instances of PEER able to infill various parts of the writing process, enabling the use of self-training techniques for increasing the quality, amount and diversity of training data. This unlocks PEER's full potential by making it applicable in domains for which no edit histories are available and improving its ability to follow instructions, to write useful comments, and to explain its actions. We show that PEER achieves strong performance across various domains and editing tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29004415-b057-415b-8adf-dfca42fa1bccCited by top-tier papers26
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive CritiquingZhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al.ICLR 2024 · 699 citations
- MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language FeedbackXingyao Wang, Zihan Wang, Jiateng Liu, Yangyi Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 308 citations
- OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Qian Liu, Armel Randy Zebaze, Qinkai Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 203 citations
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
Related papers
- Copy is All You NeedTian Lan, Deng Cai, Yan Wang, Heyan Huang et al.ICLR 2023
- What does the Failure to Reason with "Respectively" in Zero/Few-Shot Settings Tell Us about Language Models?Ruixiang Cui, Seolhwa Lee, Daniel Hershcovich, Anders SøgaardACL 2023 · 1 citation
- Think&Cite: Improving Attributed Text Generation with Self-Guided Tree Search and Progress Reward ModelingJunyi Li, Hwee Tou NgACL 2025 · 5 citations
- A Unified Pretraining Framework for Passage Ranking and ExpansionMing Yan, Chenliang Li, Bin Bi, Wei Wang et al.AAAI 2021 · 14 citations
- GPT-ReID: Learning Fine-grained Representation with GPT for Text-based Person RetrievalXudong Wang, Lei Tan, Pingyang Dai, Liujuan Cao et al.ACM MM 2025
