Investigating Tangible Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms for Future Smart Homes
Maximiliane Windl, Albrecht Schmidt, Sebastian S. Feger
Abstract
Most smart home devices have multiple sensors, such as cameras and microphones; however, most cannot be controlled individually. Tangible privacy mechanisms provide control over individual sensors and instill high certainty of privacy. Yet, it remains unclear how they can be used in future smart homes. We conducted three studies to understand how tangible privacy mechanisms scale across multiple devices and respond to user needs. First, we conducted a focus group (N=8) on speculative tangible control artifacts to understand the user perspective. Second, we ran a workshop at a human-computer interaction conference (N=8) on tangible privacy. Third, we conducted a six-week in-the-wild study with a tangible, static privacy dashboard across six households. Our findings help to contrast the need for tangible privacy mechanisms on the sensor level with user needs on a smart home level. Finally, we discuss our design implications for future smart homes through the lens of inclusive privacy.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 289420fb-a1c7-4dfd-8b31-98f5e8f51513Cited by top-tier papers15
- Bring Privacy To The Table: Interactive Negotiation for Privacy Settings of Shared Sensing DevicesHaozhe Zhou, Mayank Goel, Yuvraj AgarwalCHI 2024 · 19 citations
- More than just informed: The importance of consent facets in smart homesYi-Shyuan Chiang, Omar Khan, Adam Bates, Camille CobbCHI 2024 · 12 citations
- Exploring the Privacy and Security Challenges Faced by Migrant Domestic Workers in Chinese Smart HomesShijing He, Xiao Zhan, Yaxiong Lei, Yueyan Liu et al.CHI 2025 · 12 citations
- Decide Yourself or Delegate - User Preferences Regarding the Autonomy of Personal Privacy Assistants in Private IoT-Equipped EnvironmentsKarola Marky, Alina Stöver, Sarah Prange, Kira Bleck et al.CHI 2024 · 12 citations
- Do You Need to Touch? Exploring Correlations between Personal Attributes and Preferences for Tangible Privacy MechanismsSarah Delgado Rodriguez, Priyasha Chatterjee, Anh Dao Phuong, Florian Alt et al.CHI 2024 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Tangible Privacy for Smart Voice Assistants: Bystanders' Perceptions of Physical Device ControlsImtiaz Ahmad, Taslima Akter, Zachary Buher, Rosta Farzan et al.CSCW 2022 · 20 citations
- PrivacyHub: A Functional Tangible and Digital Ecosystem for Interoperable Smart Home Privacy Awareness and ControlMaximiliane Windl, Philipp Thalhammer, David Müller, Albrecht Schmidt et al.CHI 2025 · 4 citations
- Tangible Privacy: Towards User-Centric Sensor Designs for Bystander PrivacyImtiaz Ahmad, Rosta Farzan, Apu Kapadia, Adam J. LeeCSCW 2020 · 121 citations
- "It would probably turn into a social faux-pas": Users' and Bystanders' Preferences of Privacy Awareness Mechanisms in Smart HomesParth Kirankumar Thakkar, Shijing He, Shiyu Xu, Danny Yuxing Huang et al.CHI 2022 · 49 citations
- Smart Home Beyond the Home: A Case for Community-Based Access ControlMadiha Tabassum, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heather Richter LipfordCHI 2020 · 45 citations
