On Proximity Gaps of Reed-Solomon Codes
Eli Ben-Sasson, Dan Carmon, Ulrich Haböck, Swastik Kopparty, Shubhangi Saraf
Abstract
This paper is about the proximity gaps phenomenon for Reed–Solomon codes. Very roughly, the proximity gaps phenomenon for a code C ⊆ Fqn says that for two vectors f,g ∈ Fqn, if sufficiently many linear combinations f + z · g (with z ∈ Fq) are close to C in Hamming distance, then so are both f and g, up to a proximity loss of ε*. Determining the optimal quantitative form of proximity gaps for Reed–Solomon codes has recently become of great interest because of applications to interactive proofs and cryptography, and in particular, to scalable transparent arguments of knowledge (STARKs) and other modern hash based argument systems used on blockchains today. Our main results show improved positive and negative results for proximity gaps for Reed–Solomon codes of constant relative distance δ ∈ (0,1). (1) For proximity gaps up to the unique decoding radius δ/2, we show that arbitrarily small proximity loss ε* > 0 can be achieved with only Oε*(1) exceptional z’s (improving the previous bound of O(n) exceptions). (2) For proximity gaps up to the Johnson radius J(δ), we show that proximity loss ε* = 0 can be achieved with only O(n) exceptional z’s (improving the previous bound of O(n2) exceptions). This significantly reduces the soundness error in the aforementioned arguments systems. In the other direction, we show: (1) for some Reed–Solomon codes and some δ, proximity gaps at or beyond the Johnson radius J(δ) with arbitrarily small proximity loss ε* needs to have at least Ω(n1.99) exceptional z’s. (2) More generally, for all constants τ, we show that for some Reed–Solomon codes and some δ = δ(τ), proximity gaps at radius δ − Ωτ(1) with arbitrarily small proximity loss ε* needs to have nτ exceptional z’s. (3)Finally, for all Reed–Solomon codes, we show that improved proximity gaps imply improved bounds for their list-decodability. This shows that improved bounds on the list-decoding radius of Reed–Solomon codes is a prerequisite for any new proximity gaps results beyond the Johnson radius.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 25538799-ec76-4984-952b-b195eaa3ad3fBuilds on15
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 338 citations
- Proximity Gaps for Reed-Solomon CodesEli Ben-Sasson, Dan Carmon, Yuval Ishai, Swastik Kopparty et al.FOCS 2020 · 58 citations
- BaseFold: Efficient Field-Agnostic Polynomial Commitment Schemes from Foldable CodesHadas Zeilberger, Binyi Chen, Ben FischCRYPTO 2024 · 38 citations
- Polylogarithmic Proofs for Multilinears over Binary TowersBenjamin E. Diamond, Jim PosenEUROCRYPT 2026 · 36 citations
- STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer QueriesGal Arnon, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi, Eylon YogevCRYPTO 2024 · 32 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Proximity Gaps for Subspace-Design Codes and (Random) Reed-Solomon CodesRohan Goyal, Venkatesan GuruswamiSTOC 2026 · 16 citations
- Code-Based Scalable Collaborative SNARKsChristodoulos Pappas, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Charalampos PapamanthouS&P 2026
- On Reed-Solomon Proximity Gaps ConjecturesElizabeth C. Crites, Alistair StewartCRYPTO 2026 · 13 citations
- Improved List-Decodability and List-Recoverability of Reed-Solomon Codes via Tree Packings: [Extended Abstract]Zeyu Guo, Ray Li, Chong Shangguan, Itzhak Tamo et al.FOCS 2021 · 9 citations
- List-decodability with large radius for Reed-Solomon codesAsaf Ferber, Matthew Kwan, Lisa SauermannFOCS 2021 · 17 citations
