Lune

FOCS2021Top-tier venue

List-decodability with large radius for Reed-Solomon codes

Asaf Ferber, Matthew Kwan, Lisa Sauermann

2021Year
17Citations
9Top-tier citations

Abstract

List-decodability of Reed-Solomon codes has re-ceived a lot of attention, but the best-possible dependence between the parameters is still not well-understood. In this work, we focus on the case where the list-decoding radius is of the formr=1−εr=1-\varepsilonforε\varepsilontending to zero. Our main result states that there exist Reed-Solomon codes with rateΩ(ε)\Omega(\varepsilon)which are(1−ε,O(1/ε)(1-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon)-list-decodable, meaning that any Hamming ball of radius1−ε1-\varepsiloncontains at mostO(1/ε)O(1/\varepsilon)codewords. This trade-off between rate and list-decoding radius is best-possible for any code with list size less than exponential in the block length. By achieving this trade-off between rate and list-decoding radius we improve a recent result of Guo, Li, Shangguan, Tamo, and Wootters, and resolve the main motivating question of their work. Moreover, while their result requires the field to be exponentially large in the block length, we only need the field size to be polynomially large (and in fact, almost-linear suffices). We deduce our main result from a more general theorem, in which we prove good list-decodability properties of random puncturings of any given code with very large distance.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 9c804756-5826-4c44-b956-8d47a600e2a0

Cited by top-tier papers9

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on1

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines