NILE : Natural Language Inference with Faithful Natural Language Explanations
Sawan Kumar, Partha P. Talukdar
Abstract
The recent growth in the popularity and success of deep learning models on NLP classification tasks has accompanied the need for generating some form of natural language explanation of the predicted labels. Such generated natural language (NL) explanations are expected to be faithful, i.e., they should correlate well with the model's internal decision making. In this work, we focus on the task of natural language inference (NLI) and address the following question: can we build NLI systems which produce labels with high accuracy, while also generating faithful explanations of its decisions? We propose Naturallanguage Inference over Label-specific Explanations (NILE), a novel NLI method which utilizes auto-generated label-specific NL explanations to produce labels along with its faithful explanation. We demonstrate NILE's effectiveness over previously reported methods through automated and human evaluation of the produced labels and explanations. Our evaluation of NILE also supports the claim that accurate systems capable of providing testable explanations of their decisions can be designed. We discuss the faithfulness of NILE's explanations in terms of sensitivity of the decisions to the corresponding explanations. We argue that explicit evaluation of faithfulness, in addition to label and explanation accuracy, is an important step in evaluating model's explanations. Further, we demonstrate that task-specific probes are necessary to establish such sensitivity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 25377464-5f39-4c21-b19b-7642f079c04bCited by top-tier papers35
- e-ViL: A Dataset and Benchmark for Natural Language Explanations in Vision-Language TasksMaxime Kayser, Oana-Maria Camburu, Leonard Salewski, Cornelius Emde et al.ICCV 2021 · 115 citations
- Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language ExplanationsYanda Chen, Ruiqi Zhong, Narutatsu Ri, Chen Zhao et al.ICML 2024 · 90 citations
- Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language InferenceJoe Stacey, Yonatan Belinkov, Marek ReiAAAI 2022 · 52 citations
- UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale ExtractionAaron Chan, Maziar Sanjabi, Lambert Mathias, Liang Tan et al.ICML 2022 · 48 citations
- Learning to Rationalize for Nonmonotonic Reasoning with Distant SupervisionFaeze Brahman, Vered Shwartz, Rachel Rudinger, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2021 · 46 citations
Builds on3
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- Semantics-Aware BERT for Language UnderstandingZhuosheng Zhang, Yuwei Wu, Hai Zhao, Zuchao Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 396 citations
- ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP ModelsJay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Eric P. Lehman et al.ACL 2020 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Logical Satisfiability of Counterfactuals for Faithful Explanations in NLISuzanna Sia, Anton Belyy, Amjad Almahairi, Madian Khabsa et al.AAAI 2023 · 17 citations
- Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation FrameworkShuzhou Yuan, Jingyi Sun, Ran Zhang, Michael Färber et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Zero-Shot Natural Language ExplanationsFawaz Sammani, Nikos DeligiannisICLR 2025
- MaNtLE: Model-agnostic Natural Language ExplainerRakesh R. Menon, Kerem Zaman, Shashank SrivastavaEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- Alignment Rationale for Natural Language InferenceZhongtao Jiang, Yuanzhe Zhang, Zhao Yang, Jun Zhao et al.ACL 2021
