ACL Findings2021
REAM: An Enhancement Approach to Reference-based Evaluation Metrics for Open-domain Dialog Generation
Jun Gao, Wei Bi, Ruifeng Xu, Shuming Shi
Abstract
The lack of reliable automatic evaluation metrics is a major impediment to the development of open-domain dialogue systems. Various reference-based metrics have been proposed to calculate a score between a predicted response and a small set of references. However, these metrics show unsatisfactory correlations with human judgments. For a referencebased metric, its reliability mainly depends on two factors: its ability to measure the similarity between the predicted response and the reference response, as well as the reliability of the given reference set. Yet, there are few discussions on the latter. Our work attempts to fill this vacancy. We first clarify an assumption on reference-based metrics that, if more high-quality references are added into the reference set, the reliability of the metric will increase. Next, we present REAM : an enhancement approach to Reference-based EvAluation Metrics 1 for open-domain dialogue systems. A prediction model is designed to estimate the reliability of the given reference set. We show how its predicted results can be helpful to augment the reference set, and thus improve the reliability of the metric. Experiments validate both the effectiveness of our prediction model and that the reliability of reference-based metrics improves with the augmented reference sets.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on7
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Slot-consistent NLG for Task-oriented Dialogue Systems with Iterative Rectification NetworkYangming Li, Kaisheng Yao, Libo Qin, Wanxiang Che et al.ACL 2020 · 18 citations
- Assessing Dialogue Systems with Distribution DistancesJiannan Xiang, Yahui Liu, Deng Cai, Huayang Li et al.ACL Findings 2021 · 17 citations
- Enhancing the Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluation in Latent SpaceZhangming Chan, Lemao Liu, Juntao Li, Haisong Zhang et al.ACL Findings 2021 · 14 citations
- BLEU might be Guilty but References are not InnocentMarkus Freitag, David Grangier, Isaac CaswellEMNLP 2020 · 13 citations
Related papers
- RADE: Reference-Assisted Dialogue Evaluation for Open-Domain DialogueZhengliang Shi, Weiwei Sun, Shuo Zhang, Zhen Zhang et al.ACL 2023 · 5 citations
- DEnsity: Open-domain Dialogue Evaluation Metric using Density EstimationChaeHun Park, Seungil Chad Lee, Daniel Rim, Jaegul ChooACL Findings 2023 · 2 citations
- Measuring and Improving Semantic Diversity of Dialogue GenerationSeungju Han, Beomsu Kim, Buru ChangEMNLP Findings 2022 · 7 citations
- Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogues in Latent Space with Next Sentence Prediction and Mutual InformationKun Zhao, Bohao Yang, Chenghua Lin, Wenge Rong et al.ACL 2023 · 14 citations
- Beyond User Self-Reported Likert Scale Ratings: A Comparison Model for Automatic Dialog EvaluationWeixin Liang, James Zou, Zhou YuACL 2020 · 25 citations
