Multimodal Language Models See Better When They Look Shallower
Haoran Chen, Junyan Lin, Xinghao Chen, Yue Fan, Jianfeng Dong, Xin Jin, Hui Su, Jinlan Fu, Xiaoyu Shen
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) typically extract visual features from the final layers of a pretrained Vision Transformer (ViT). This widespread deep-layer bias, however, is largely driven by empirical convention rather than principled analysis. While prior studies suggest that different ViT layers capture different types of information-shallower layers focusing on fine visual details and deeper layers aligning more closely with textual semantics, the impact of this variation on MLLM performance remains underexplored. We present the first comprehensive study of visual layer selection for MLLMs, analyzing representation similarity across ViT layers to establish shallow, middle, and deep layer groupings. Through extensive evaluation of MLLMs (1.4B-7B parameters) across 10 benchmarks encompassing 60+ tasks, we find that while deep layers excel in semantic-rich tasks like OCR, shallow and middle layers significantly outperform them on fine-grained visual tasks including counting, positioning, and object localization. Building on these insights, we propose a lightweight feature fusion method that strategically incorporates shallower layers, achieving consistent improvements over both single-layer and specialized fusion baselines. Our work offers the first principled study of visual layer selection in MLLMs, showing that MLLMs can often see better when they look shallower.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2319032e-50bb-4a07-8fd6-edbb884f5fe1Cited by top-tier papers3
- What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language ModelsYingqi Fan, Junlong Tong, Anhao Zhao, Xiaoyu ShenCVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- Gated Relational Alignment via Confidence-based Distillation for Efficient VLMsYanlong Chen, Amir Habibian, Luca Benini, Yawei LiICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Correcting Visual Blur Induced by Attention Distraction to Reduce Hallucinations: Algorithm and TheoryQuanjiang Li, Zhiming Liu, Wei Luo, Tingjin Luo et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on11
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated CapabilitiesWeihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 1,191 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
Related papers
- Multi-Layer Visual Feature Fusion in Multimodal LLMs: Methods, Analysis, and Best PracticesJunyan Lin, Haoran Chen, Yue Fan, Yingqi Fan et al.CVPR 2025
- DeepStack: Deeply Stacking Visual Tokens is Surprisingly Simple and Effective for LMMsLingchen Meng, Jianwei Yang, Rui Tian, Xiyang Dai et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 89 citations
- Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language ModelsClement Neo, Luke Ong, Philip Torr, Mor Geva et al.ICLR 2025
- Predictive Regularization Against Visual Representation Degradation in Multimodal Large Language ModelsEnguang Wang, Qiang Wang, Yuanchen Wu, Ke Yan et al.CVPR 2026
- LLaVA-SP: Enhancing Visual Representation with Visual Spatial Tokens for MLLMsHaoran Lou, Chunxiao Fan, Ziyan Liu, Yuexin Wu et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
