Budget Recycling Differential Privacy
Bo Jiang, Jian Du, Sagar Sharma, Qiang Yan
Abstract
Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms usually force reduction in data utility by producing "out-of-bound" noisy results for a tight privacy budget. We introduce the Budget Recycling Differential Privacy (BR-DP) framework, designed to provide soft-bounded noisy outputs for a broad range of existing DP mechanisms. By "soft-bounded," we refer to the mechanism’s ability to release most outputs within a predefined error boundary, thereby improving utility and maintaining privacy simultaneously. The core of BR-DP consists of two components: a DP kernel responsible for generating a noisy answer per iteration, and a recycler that probabilistically recycles/regenerates or releases the noisy answer. We delve into the privacy accounting of BR-DP, culminating in the development of a budgeting principle that optimally sub-allocates the available budget between the DP kernel and the recycler. Furthermore, we introduce algorithms for tight BR-DP accounting in composition scenarios, and our findings indicate that BR-DP achieves reduced privacy leakage post-composition compared to DP. Additionally, we explore the concept of privacy amplification via subsampling within the BR-DP framework and propose optimal sampling rates for BR-DP across various queries. We experiment with real data, and the results demonstrate BR-DP’s effectiveness in lifting the utility-privacy tradeoff provided by DP mechanisms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 22b9b35b-0e0e-46d0-9be1-d634abc5e49cCited by top-tier papers2
- How Researchers De-Identify Data in PracticeWentao Guo, Paige Pepitone, Adam J. Aviv, Michelle L. MazurekUSENIX Security 2025
- Meeting Utility Constraints in Differential Privacy: A Privacy-Boosting ApproachBo Jiang, Wanrong Zhang, Donghang Lu, Jian Du et al.S&P 2025
Builds on3
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- The Discrete Gaussian for Differential PrivacyClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Thomas SteinkeNeurIPS 2020 · 355 citations
Related papers
- The Adverse Effects of Omitting Records in Differential Privacy: How Sampling and Suppression Degrade the Privacy–Utility TradeoffÀlex Miranda-Pascual, Javier Parra-Arnau, Thorsten StrufeUSENIX Security 2026
- Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy AmplificationJan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- A General Framework for Per-record Differential PrivacyXinghe Chen, Dajun Sun, Quanqing Xu, Wei DongSIGMOD 2026
- Wasserstein Differential PrivacyChengyi Yang, Jiayin Qi, Aimin ZhouAAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Efficient privacy loss accounting for subsampling and random allocationVitaly Feldman, Moshe ShenfeldICML 2026 · 5 citations
