Trading-Off Payments and Accuracy in Online Classification with Paid Stochastic Experts
Dirk van der Hoeven, Ciara Pike-Burke, Hao Qiu, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
Abstract
We investigate online classification with paid stochastic experts. Here, before making their prediction, each expert must be paid. The amount that we pay each expert directly influences the accuracy of their prediction through some unknown Lipschitz"productivity"function. In each round, the learner must decide how much to pay each expert and then make a prediction. They incur a cost equal to a weighted sum of the prediction error and upfront payments for all experts. We introduce an online learning algorithm whose total cost after rounds exceeds that of a predictor which knows the productivity of all experts in advance by at most where is the number of experts. In order to achieve this result, we combine Lipschitz bandits and online classification with surrogate losses. These tools allow us to improve upon the bound of order one would obtain in the standard Lipschitz bandit setting. Our algorithm is empirically evaluated on synthetic data
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- Online Learning with Primary and Secondary LossesAvrim Blum, Han ShaoNeurIPS 2020 · 1 citation
- Bandit and Delayed Feedback in Online Structured PredictionYuki Shibukawa, Taira Tsuchiya, Shinsaku Sakaue, Kenji YamanishiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Classification with PredictionsVinod Raman, Ambuj TewariNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Memory bounds for the experts problemVaidehi Srinivas, David P. Woodruff, Ziyu Xu, Samson ZhouSTOC 2022 · 4 citations
- On Robust Streaming for Learning with Experts: Algorithms and Lower BoundsDavid P. Woodruff, Fred Zhang, Samson ZhouNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
