Dependency Matters: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Explicit Knowledge Grounding
Xiangyu Wen, Min Li, Junhua Huang, Jianyuan Zhong, Zhijian Xu, Zeju Li, Yongxiang Huang, Mingxuan Yuan, Qiang Xu
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often produce reasoning steps that are superficially coherent yet internally inconsistent, leading to unreliable outputs. Since such failures typically arise from implicit or poorly-grounded knowledge, we introduce Grounded Reasoning in Dependency (GRiD) , a novel dependency-aware reasoning framework that explicitly grounds reasoning steps in structured knowledge. GRiD represents reasoning as a graph consisting of interconnected knowledge extraction nodes and reasoning nodes, enforcing logical consistency through explicit dependencies. Each reasoning step is validated via a lightweight, step-wise verifier that ensures logical correctness relative to its premises. Extensive experiments across diverse reasoning benchmarks—including StrategyQA, CommonsenseQA, GPQA, and TruthfulQA—demonstrate that GRiD substantially improves reasoning accuracy, consistency, and faithfulness compared to recent state-of-the-art structured reasoning methods. Notably, GRiD enhances performance even when applied purely as a lightweight verification module at inference time, underscoring its generalizability and practical utility † .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 20f50178-db44-4469-89b0-0b7d74f472a6Builds on31
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
Related papers
- Language Models with RationalityNora Kassner, Oyvind Tafjord, Ashish Sabharwal, Kyle Richardson et al.EMNLP 2023 · 7 citations
- Calibrating Reasoning in Language Models with Internal ConsistencyZhihui Xie, Jizhou Guo, Tong Yu, Shuai LiNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- ProgRAG: Hallucination-Resistant Progressive Retrieval and Reasoning over Knowledge GraphsMinbae Park, Hyemin Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Kunsoo Park et al.AAAI 2026
- Human Cognition Inspired RAG with Knowledge Graph for Complex Problem SolvingYao Cheng, Yibo Zhao, Jiapeng Zhu, Yao Liu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- MIDGARD: Self-Consistency Using Minimum Description Length for Structured Commonsense ReasoningInderjeet Nair, Lu WangACL 2024
