Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translation
Elena Voita, Rico Sennrich, Ivan Titov
Abstract
In Neural Machine Translation (and, more generally, conditional language modeling), the generation of a target token is influenced by two types of context: the source and the prefix of the target sequence. While many attempts to understand the internal workings of NMT models have been made, none of them explicitly evaluates relative source and target contributions to a generation decision. We argue that this relative contribution can be evaluated by adopting a variant of Layerwise Relevance Propagation (LRP). Its underlying 'conservation principle' makes relevance propagation unique: differently from other methods, it evaluates not an abstract quantity reflecting token importance, but the proportion of each token's influence. We extend LRP to the Transformer and conduct an analysis of NMT models which explicitly evaluates the source and target relative contributions to the generation process. We analyze changes in these contributions when conditioning on different types of prefixes, when varying the training objective or the amount of training data, and during the training process. We find that models trained with more data tend to rely on source information more and to have more sharp token contributions; the training process is non-monotonic with several stages of different nature. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers21
- Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language ModelsKushal Tirumala, Aram H. Markosyan, Luke Zettlemoyer, Armen AghajanyanNeurIPS 2022 · 304 citations
- AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for TransformersReduan Achtibat, Sayed Mohammad Vakilzadeh Hatefi, Maximilian Dreyer, Aakriti Jain et al.ICML 2024 · 113 citations
- DIFNet: Boosting Visual Information Flow for Image CaptioningMingrui Wu, Xuying Zhang, Xiaoshuai Sun, Yiyi Zhou et al.CVPR 2022 · 68 citations
- All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational QualityWilliam Timkey, Marten van SchijndelEMNLP 2021 · 59 citations
- Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even BetterDavid Dale, Elena Voita, Loïc Barrault, Marta R. Costa-jussàACL 2023 · 25 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the TransformerJavier Ferrando, Gerard I. Gállego, Belen Alastruey, Carlos Escolano et al.EMNLP 2022 · 18 citations
- XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative PropagationAmeen Ali, Thomas Schnake, Oliver Eberle, Grégoire Montavon et al.ICML 2022 · 144 citations
- Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build PredictionsJavier Ferrando, Gerard I. Gállego, Ioannis Tsiamas, Marta R. Costa-jussàACL 2023 · 9 citations
- Revisiting LRP: Positional Attribution as the Missing Ingredient for Transformer ExplainabilityYarden Bakish, Itamar Zimerman, Hila Chefer, Lior WolfNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Token-wise Decomposition of Autoregressive Language Model Hidden States for Analyzing Model PredictionsByung-Doh Oh, William SchulerACL 2023 · 1 citation
