Teach a Reward Model to Correct Itself: Reward Guided Adversarial Failure Discovery for Robust Reward Modeling
Pankayaraj Pathmanathan, Furong Huang
Abstract
Capital One Reward modeling (RM), which captures human preferences to align large language models (LLMs), is increasingly employed in tasks such as model fine-tuning, response filtering, and ranking. However, due to the inherent complexity of human preferences and the limited coverage of available datasets, reward models often fail under distributional shifts or adversarial perturbations. Existing approaches for identifying such failure modes typically rely on prior knowledge about preference distributions or failure attributes, limiting their practicality in real-world settings where such information is unavailable. In this work, we propose a tractable, preference-distribution-agnostic method for discovering reward model failure modes via rewardguided controlled decoding. Building on this, we introduce REFORM, a self-improving reward modeling framework that enhances robustness by using the reward model itself to guide the generation of falsely scored responses. These adversarial examples are then used to augment the training data and patch the reward model's misaligned behavior. We evaluate REFORM on two widely-used preference datasets-Anthropic Helpful-Harmless (HH) and PKU Beavertails-and demonstrate that it significantly improves robustness without sacrificing reward quality. Notably, REFORM preserves performance both in direct evaluation and in downstream policy training, and further improves alignment quality by removing spurious correlations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1ffa8361-2b4e-48c8-a5ec-39820cc04672Builds on11
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and DiversityRobert Kirk, Ishita Mediratta, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jelena Luketina et al.ICLR 2024 · 332 citations
Related papers
- WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward ModelsAlexandre Ramé, Nino Vieillard, Léonard Hussenot, Robert Dadashi et al.ICML 2024 · 145 citations
- One Bias After Another: Mechanistic Reward Shaping and Persistent Biases in Language Reward ModelsDaniel Fein, Max Lamparth, Violet Xiang, Mykel Kochenderfer et al.ICML 2026
- Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal PerspectiveKasia Kobalczyk, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2025
- DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language ModelsJames Y. Huang, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi-An Lai et al.ACL 2025
- GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward GeneralizationChenglong Wang, Yang Gan, Yifu Huo, Yongyu Mu et al.ICML 2025
